What do you think of the gun control Obama is proposing?

Your repetition of the strawman fallacy won't change the fact that it's a flawed argument. Trying to patch it up with red herrings and ad homs won't change that fact either.

I'm not surprised to see that all you've done is lie about me some more.

I'm not at all surprised that you're continuing to engage in denialism and faulty logic, so I guess that makes us even.

Get your lies straight. You're the one who is trying to deny something. Namely, you're trying to deny that you openly agreed with violating the civil rights of disabled people.

Your lie about my logic is of course simply another of your neverending lies.

I've been thinking about the sort of person who would support an outrageous civil rights violation, and then respond with a slew of aggressive lies about people for merely challenging you about what you wrote, and it really must frustrate you to no end that the only thing you can do to me is lie about me.

I hope you haven't broken much furniture. Anyway, lucky me that you can't do anything to actually harm me.

So you still think you can advance your argument with strawman fallacies and ad homs? Feel free to google those things, if you're not sure what they mean.

Nyah nyah. Sticks and stones can break my bones, but your incessant lying can never hurt me.

I don't doubt it. You're definitely impervious to reasoning. Congratulations! You must be proud of yourself. That's quite an unacheivement.

Come now. You've not tried reasoning. From the moment that I had the audacity to challenge what you wrote, all you've done is lie about me.



My defense of civil rights does indeed make me feel good about myself. As does my defense of innocent people. I can testify that being an all-around good guy really does lead to happiness and contentment.

Spin, spin, spin, name-call, spin, spin....blah blah blah. You're boring. I think I'll do something more fun and productive than trying to reason with you, like stabbing myself in the back of the hand with a dinner fork.

Gosh! Heaven forbid you'd actually try posting a reasoned argument.

Perhaps spin is in the eye of the beholder, so I'll not deny that even though I probably should. The allegation that I've engaged in name-calling though is (surprise surprise) a lie.

Like I said, spin, spin, spin. Empty rhetoric on top of empty rhetoric, logical fallacy on top of logical fallacy. It's not easy to fail so thoroughly, but somehow you've managed to pull it off.

Nyah nyah. Sticks and stones can break my bones, but your incessant lying can never hurt me.

Go ahead if it will make you feel better.

It'd be more productive than trying to get you to produce a logically valid argument.

I'm more of a fact person. I'm usually happy pointing out the truth and letting people draw their own logical conclusions.

But if you want a logical discussion, try making some logical arguments and see what happens.

As long as all you do is lie about people, the only thing you are likely to encounter is people complaining that they are being lied about.

I exposed your logical fallacies several times over. You're not fooling anybody. Boring them, at best.

You're back to lying about me I see. Oh well.

Read the thread.

Thread summary:

You expressed agreement with violating the civil rights of large numbers of disabled people.

I chastised you for that.

You reacted with a massive campaign of lies about me.

For all your whining about logic, you've not tried to make a single logical argument in the entire thread.