What do you think of the gun control Obama is proposing?

The point was that what is and is not constitutional is not defined by ollaroy and there are other people and processes responsible for it.

It is still law because it has not been adjudicated to be unconstitutional

and if it were as much of a slam dunk as you portray then it would be done.

Here is a George Washington quote (if it is accurate) re the 2nd amendment:

"A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies."

Oversimplification, red herring, straw man appeals, etc. Yeah, I've detected plenty of your bullshit.

So you try to refute the observation that you commit logical fallacies by posting another logical fallacy. Nice.

FBM wrote:

So you try to refute the observation that you commit logical fallacies by posting another logical fallacy. Nice.

Liar.

FBM wrote:

So you try to refute the observation that you commit logical fallacies by posting another logical fallacy. Nice.

Liar.

It is possible to look at what the Constitution means, and note what does and doesn't violate it.

Like I said, someone needs to get this matter before a judge.

It is harder than you think to get an unconstitutional law overturned. You need just the right case before a judge will even consider the issue.

As Kuklinski and his colleagues established, in the U.S., the most misinformed citizens tend to be the most confident in their views and are also the strongest partisans. These folks fill the gaps in their knowledge base by using their existing belief systems. Once these inferences are stored into memory, they become “indistinguishable from hard data,” Kuklinski and his colleagues found.

Furthermore, in 2010, political scientists Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler found that when misinformed citizens are told that their facts are wrong, they often cling to their opinions even more strongly with what is known as defensive processing, or the “backfire effect.”

As Nyhan and Reifler’s research suggests, attempts to present corrections and generate counterarguments to the group’s beliefs only strengthened their opinions.

And yet another one.

What it means is subjective and open to interpretation and reinterpretation. It is subjective.

And if it were as black and white an unconstitutional issue as you make out it would have been.

The thing I'm trying to get you to consider, but that you probably won't is that perhaps some things you consider "unconstitutional" are things society does not agree with you on and will not agree with you on.

Robert is right, oralloy is not.

What the Constitutio means has been argued over since it was written,

and oralloy consistently agues for non-mainstream interpretations.

Nyhan and Reifler, meet oralloy.

The research confirms my suspicion that it's best not to try to bring facts to some people. Old-school advice in a way.

I own a small arsenal and I carry on my job whenever Im in deep woods. I do geese hunting which I took up later in life.