0
   

Cheney, almost everyone's Vice-President

 
 
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 10:38 am
Quote:
Upset by a requirement to sign an I-support-George-Bush pledge in order to see Vice President Dick Cheney in Rio Rancho today, an Albuquerque attorney went to court late Friday to ask that the event be open to people of all political stripes or shut down.
A judge quickly turned her down?- because Republicans were never informed that they were being taken to court.

Quote:
Earlier, Republicans doling out tickets to the free event were limiting them to people with a record of supporting the GOP?- or to others willing to sign a statement saying they support President Bush's re-election.

Republicans said the rally will be a thank you to supporters and, like anyone giving a private celebration, the political party can limit the guest list to its friends. The petition for the temporary restraining order argued that requiring an endorsement as a prerequisite to attending the rally at a public school violates constitutional protections of free speech and freedom of assembly. Because they suspected they'd see more Democrats, the Bush campaign decided to draft a form for anyone to sign before getting a ticket. The form reads: "In signing the above endorsement you are consenting to use and release of your name by Bush-Cheney as an endorser of President Bush."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,162 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 10:48 am
constitutional protections? That applies only to elected officials, doesn't it?
0 Replies
 
Justthefax
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 10:57 am
I See nothing wrong with a group allowing only supporters to attend events like this. If the event is sponsored by a school or non-political organization that sponsor may impose their requirements of attendance.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 11:02 am
I disagree. If they want to have a party for their supporters they need to rent a private hall in a hotel or the like, not use taxpayer funded property and then exclude a group of taxpayers.

I agree that they're within their rights to have a party for their supporters, just not in a taxpayer funded facility.
0 Replies
 
Justthefax
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 11:11 am
I do not know the full story. However private parties can be held in public places. If the group was renting the place.
0 Replies
 
the reincarnation of suzy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 04:18 pm
Positively bizarre!
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 04:34 pm
The last time Bill Clinton and later Hillary Clinton were in town (Albuquerque) I was not welcome there either. This is normal procedure for 'closed gatherings'.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 05:27 pm
it doesn't make good image, be it republican or democrat.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 06:05 pm
hmmmmm, and i was just thinking 'what a brilliant opportunity'.
sign up - and then write a letter to the editor (and everyone else you can think of) "when i went in, i was a signed-on republican supporter. now that i've seen the fella, i'm signing-out". what fun!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Cheney, almost everyone's Vice-President
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/05/2026 at 03:27:39