1
   

Berger Refresher

 
 
swolf
 
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 01:04 am
A reminder of who Sandy Berger is, for anybody who might have forgotten...

http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/101465.jpg
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 542 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 01:09 am
So, in your opinion,Berger's bio is a fake.
0 Replies
 
swolf
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 07:52 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
So, in your opinion,Berger's bio is a fake.


We may someday have to fight an unnecessary war against China on account of this guy and his boss Slick Clinton, and that war could be vastly more costly than need be on account of them.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 09:42 am
Quote:
During the last several years, the People's Republic of China has developed ambitious plans for the installation of a substantial number of nuclear power stations. The proposed agreement reflects the desire of the Government of the United States and the Government of the People's Republic of China to establish a framework for peaceful nuclear cooperation. During the period of our negotiations and discussions, China took several important steps that clarify its non-proliferation and nuclear export policips. Premier Zhao has made important statements of China's non-proliferation policy that make clear that China will not contribute to proliferation. Those statements have been endorsed by the National People's Congress, thereby giving them official status. Based on our talks with the Chinese, we can expect that China's policy of not assisting a non-nuclear weapon state to acquire nuclear explosives will be implemented in a manner consistent with the basic non-proliferation practices common to the United Statpes and other suppliers. Further, in conjunction with China's membership in the International Atomic Energy Agency, effective January 1, 1984, China has said that it will require IAEA safeguards on its future nuclear export commitments to non-nuclear weapons states.
I have considered the views and recommendations of the interested agencies in reviewing the proposed agreement and have determined that its performance will promote, and will not constitute an unreasonable risk to, the common defense and security. Accordingly, I have approved the agreement and authorized its execution.
RONALD REAGAN

THE WHITE HOUSE,
July 24, 1985.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Berger Refresher
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/17/2024 at 09:54:38