Reply
Fri 23 Jul, 2004 08:48 am
The guys on FreeRepublic think they have something which could end the Kerry campaign; apparently, a couple of web pages were very hastily pulled from the Kerry web site after the Bergler story broke, and the guys at FR have retrieved them via the google cache mechanism.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1175720/posts?page=18
The ultimate beneficiary of that, of course, at least prior to the election in Nov., would be one H. Klintler. No quotes on this one, you've gotta read the whole thing. Post #38 seems to hold the main key to it however.
Really you thought this was worth your time and effort?
explains an awful lot
This is alarming.
Quote:Terror is the principle threat we face.
Apparently somebody doesn't know the difference between principal and principle.
Redheat wrote:You do know that Free Republic isn't actually a real news site?
ROTFLMAO, this from someone who posts opinion pieces by biased hacks and pretends they are facts!
Karzak-how about giving us an example of that which you are whining about? You know, an actual link to a specious article quoted by redheat instead of a general comment.
Ooh, they're onto yet another Dem conspiracy!
Drats, foiled again!
I see nothing there of suspicion, myself. Maybe it was removed so bush, having no concrete ideas of his own, wouldn't steal it!
Sagamore wrote:Karzak-how about giving us an example of that which you are whining about?
LOL, unable to look at the first page of the forum without someone to guide you?
Sagamore wrote:Karzak-how about giving us an example of that which you are whining about? You know, an actual link to a specious article quoted by redheat instead of a general comment.
First, Karzak said nothing about "specious articles", he referenced opinion pieces as opposed to factual reportage. OK, you call for links? Easy enough; here are ten examples from redheat's recent offerings, several of which contain links to more than one op-ed piece, and others to partisan talking-point lists. Not to say facts may or may not have been included or referenced in the linked articles, just that the linked articles qualify as op-ed.
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=802841#802841
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=801056#801056
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=802999#802999
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=802680#802680
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=801003#801003
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=799028#799028
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=799064#799064
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=798087#798087
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=793270#793270
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=789577#789577
But my favorite redheat meltdown is this classic pairing, wherein redheat misunderstands the meaning of "Rush Transcript", and dismisses an actual CNN program transcript as being a Rush Limbaugh opinion piece
:
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=786628#786628 and
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=786932#786932
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace