Reply
Thu 17 Sep, 2015 01:19 pm
Context:
hopes on the origin of life. The root of evolution in non-biological
chemistry somehow seems to present a bigger gap than any par-
ticular transition during subsequent evolution. And in one sense it
is a bigger gap. That one sense is quite specific, and it offers no
comfort to the religious apologist. The origin of life only had to
happen once. We therefore can allow it to have been an extremely
improbable event, many orders of magnitude more improbable
than most people realize, as I shall show. Subsequent evolutionary
steps are duplicated, in more or less similar ways, throughout
millions and millions of species independently, and continually and repeatedly throughout geological time. Therefore, to explain the evolution of complex life, we cannot resort to the same kind of statistical reasoning as we are able to apply to the origin of life. The
events that constitute run-of-the-mill evolution, as distinct from its
singular origin (and perhaps a few special cases), cannot have been
very improbable.
-The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins
Subsequent evolutionary steps are duplicated ... [in] ... millions of species independently
@oristarA,
In other words Ori, it denies a connection between steps seeming similar
@Tes yeux noirs,
Tes yeux noirs wrote:
Subsequent evolutionary steps are duplicated ... [in] ... millions of species independently
Thanks but sorry because I felt nothing got improved in understanding the question.
Each step of duplication is done independently?
@dalehileman,
dalehileman wrote:
In other words Ori, it denies a connection between steps seeming similar
I got a vogue picture from this. But I failed to get a clear one.
@oristarA,
Not steps of duplication. Steps of evolution that happen to different species independently (ie are duplicated)
@oristarA,
Quote:failed to get a clear one
"duplicated...independently" says in spite of an apparent connection betweens steps in the evolution of one critter and those of another, they're not inter-related