0
   

Does "independently" refer to "(each species duplicating itself) independently"?

 
 
Reply Thu 17 Sep, 2015 01:19 pm

Context:

hopes on the origin of life. The root of evolution in non-biological
chemistry somehow seems to present a bigger gap than any par-
ticular transition during subsequent evolution. And in one sense it
is a bigger gap. That one sense is quite specific, and it offers no
comfort to the religious apologist. The origin of life only had to
happen once. We therefore can allow it to have been an extremely
improbable event, many orders of magnitude more improbable
than most people realize, as I shall show. Subsequent evolutionary
steps are duplicated, in more or less similar ways, throughout
millions and millions of species independently, and continually and repeatedly throughout geological time. Therefore, to explain the evolution of complex life, we cannot resort to the same kind of statistical reasoning as we are able to apply to the origin of life. The
events that constitute run-of-the-mill evolution, as distinct from its
singular origin (and perhaps a few special cases), cannot have been
very improbable.

-The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 453 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
Tes yeux noirs
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 17 Sep, 2015 01:23 pm
Subsequent evolutionary steps are duplicated ... [in] ... millions of species independently
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Sep, 2015 01:42 pm
@oristarA,
In other words Ori, it denies a connection between steps seeming similar
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Sep, 2015 09:30 pm
@Tes yeux noirs,
Tes yeux noirs wrote:

Subsequent evolutionary steps are duplicated ... [in] ... millions of species independently


Thanks but sorry because I felt nothing got improved in understanding the question.

Each step of duplication is done independently?
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Sep, 2015 09:31 pm
@dalehileman,
dalehileman wrote:

In other words Ori, it denies a connection between steps seeming similar


I got a vogue picture from this. But I failed to get a clear one.
Tes yeux noirs
  Selected Answer
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 12:51 am
@oristarA,
Not steps of duplication. Steps of evolution that happen to different species independently (ie are duplicated)
0 Replies
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2015 02:06 pm
@oristarA,
Quote:
failed to get a clear one
"duplicated...independently" says in spite of an apparent connection betweens steps in the evolution of one critter and those of another, they're not inter-related
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Is this comma splice? Is it proper? - Question by DaveCoop
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
Is the second "playing needed? - Question by tanguatlay
should i put "that" here ? - Question by Chen Ta
Unbeknownst to me - Question by kuben123
alternative way - Question by Nousher Ahmed
Could check my grammar mistakes please? - Question by LonelyGamer
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Does "independently" refer to "(each species duplicating itself) independently"?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/24/2024 at 04:28:50