2
   

Removing criminals from society without going to their level

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:27 pm
You are SOOOOOO dry!!!

Hey - when you get back from hell...I mean basic - why not do a couple of threads about these fantasies of yours?

Your fantasies is fun! 'Twould be fun to co-create a world - De Kere/A2k we could call it!

Kere2k?
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:40 pm
He he, I'll try it.

To sum up my fantasy certain technologies wre invented and a planet was created. I own the planet and start to build it's ecosystem from scratch. Then it is peopled. I'd considered sending people who must be removed from my private utopia to earth but felt bad for earthlings and decided I'd need to create another planet for this.

As in all my fantasies it is a god-game that is micro managed right down to the smallest detail.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:43 pm
a Utopia?

!!!!!!!!!!!!!

oh my goodness gracious me

this oughta be good

something tells me it will run on logic.....of a linearish kind.......


Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:43 pm
(Any wonder this guy started a Very Ambitious Website? Wink)
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:49 pm
yep - and we are all in utter vaw of him..........teeheee...
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:50 pm
He he, no wonder, I had to do something to get me to stop saying "you know, on my planet people don't do that" lol

Deb it has more to do with design and planning than rules. In other words the development of the planet is less haphazard and since planned more logical. But there's nothing logical about expecting to control humans or trump evolution in societies.

So basically it's about cool stuff like making the biggest wild animal park on earth and letting a society evolve with the knowledge of earth under their belts.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:52 pm
Oh goody!!!!!

Why not start the thread now!!!!

We get to invent ANIMALS????!!!!!!!!!!!!

Me wants to invent ANIMALSSSSS!!!!!!!! NOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Stamping wittle bunny feets - bunny eyes alive with excitement - bunny tail whirring round like a furry helicopter!!!!!!

Are we allowed to invent animals on your utopia? Puhleeeeeeeze??!!
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:56 pm
Animals weren't invented in my fantasy, it all had a remote foundation in current reality.

My only deviations from current reality were in the manner the planets were created, and in teleporting (which has already been done).

I'll start it now but it's not gonna be my fantasy, with one stomp of a bunny foot all is changed.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:57 pm
Gotta be wargs!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:58 pm
meaning we CAN invent critters?

but you will lay some ground rules, no? - 'twill be more fun that way - and 'tis YOUR fantasy.....
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 06:10 pm
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2971

What do we name it? fnord?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 07:07 pm
Somewhat relevant; Oprah is having her program on the release of death row prisoners from prison in Illionis. Should be interesting. c.i.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Jan, 2003 01:27 pm
de Kere wrote:

Quote:
To sum up my fantasy certain technologies were invented and a planet was created. I own the planet and start to build it's ecosystem from scratch.


To be named:

Craven's Sim-Prison
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Jan, 2003 12:09 pm
Not fnord; Atookaia!
But seriously folks;

I think the "point" has been missed entirely, and for centuries.

It's not about removing the criminals from society; we need to remove the influence of "society" from the criminals!
0 Replies
 
Booman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Jan, 2003 09:43 pm
Huh? Confused
0 Replies
 
Booman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Jan, 2003 09:59 pm
I saw the Oprah show. The famities of the victims spoke of justice and closure, but the more they spoke, the more they sounded like they wanted blood.... Also on the show were 3 men who had spent up to nineteen years on death row. before being found innocent. The ex-govenor stated that if so many or found innocent, think how many many innocents go undiscovered.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Jan, 2003 11:21 pm
I saw parts of the show. What made it interesting was the fact that it brought out the need for revenge by the surviving family members. The ex-governor made the point that the death penalty metted out only satisfies the living, and not the dead victim. What of the cases where an innocent man is sent to his death for a crime he did not commit. Many countries have outlawed the death penalty for capital crimes. The ex-governor also claimed that all 163 cases were investigated for over three years by ex-judges, prosecutors, and lawyers, before they arrived at the conclusion to release them. I'm not sure I'm ready to criticize or compliment the release of those prisoners. Just because ex-judges, prosecutors, and lawyers investigated each case, that still doesn't answer many questions I have to determine their innocence. I cringe at the idea that all the people that spent the time to follow legal process to prosecute these people have been overturned by proxy by one man with questionable credentials. c.i.
0 Replies
 
Booman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Jan, 2003 01:24 am
That one man doesn't like killing people, especially innocent people. And he had a chance to do something about it and did it, in spite of the opinion of millions of americans, who love to kill vicariuosly, in the name of psuedo- "justice"
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Jan, 2003 01:27 am
Booman, We are a country of laws. If one person can negate the legal system of this country, why even bother serving on a jury? c.i.
0 Replies
 
Booman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Jan, 2003 01:33 am
C.I.,
...They weren't released. They will be in jail until they die. You were just deprived of a chance to see them die. Plus what he did was legal, so he didn't negate the legal system.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/29/2021 at 04:02:31