2
   

What is the subject of the sentence?

 
 
Reply Sun 6 Sep, 2015 12:30 pm
What is the subject of the sentence - "Now throw into the mix a space traveler moving through space at a fixed speed"? If a space traveler is, should "throw" be "throws"?
Or does the author refer to "Now let us throw the traveler into the mix..."?

Context:

o address this question, Vilenkin joined forces with Guth and Long Island University mathematician Arvind Borde. Using a mathematical proof, they argued that any expanding universe like ours had to have a beginning. The thought experiment they posed went like this: Imagine a universe filled with particles. As it steadily expands, the distance between particles grows. It follows that observers sprinkled throughout this expanding universe would be moving away from each other until, eventually, they occupied widely scattered regions of space. If you happened to be one of those observers, the farther an object was from you, the faster it would be moving away.

Now throw into the mix a space traveler moving through space at a fixed speed: He zooms past Earth at 100,000 kilometers per second. But when he reaches the next galaxy, which is moving away from us at, say, 20,000 kilometers per second, he will appear to be moving only 80,000 kilometers per second to observers there. As he continues on his outward journey, the space traveler’s speed will appear smaller and smaller to the observers he passes. Now we’ll run the movie backward. This time, the space traveler’s velocity will appear faster and faster at each successive galaxy.

More:
http://discovermagazine.com/2013/september/13-starting-point
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 503 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
Setanta
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Sun 6 Sep, 2015 12:46 pm
Now (you) throw into the mix a space traveler moving through space at a fixed speed. It's a thought experiment the reader is invited to indulge in.
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Sun 6 Sep, 2015 12:58 pm
@Setanta,

Yes, it's a direction, (order, or command).

Rather like a food recipe:
Take four eggs, whisk them together in a bowl, add half-a-cup of milk...
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Sep, 2015 12:59 pm
Cool.
Thank you both
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Sep, 2015 01:00 pm
@McTag,
OristarA, how come you can understand quite difficult stuff, and yet trip up over simple stuff?
Smile
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Sep, 2015 01:15 pm
@McTag,
McTag wrote:

OristarA, how come you can understand quite difficult stuff, and yet trip up over simple stuff?
Smile


Simple: you've known very well many languages of your native tongue before going to school, which are usually not taught in school. ESL students don't have this pre-school language stock and are often stumbled by them (the pre-school language stock is run by your unconsciousness. Simple enough for you native speakers, hardest for ESL students. And what is taught at college is equally hard for both natives and ESLs).
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Sep, 2015 01:16 pm
BTW, a similar question:
What does "Left on its own" mean? "For itself"?

Context:
For example, an ornate brick mansion is highly ordered, whereas a pile of bricks strewn across the ground — the result of the ravages of nature and decades or centuries of neglect — is more disordered. And brick dust, scattered by wind and water after the bricks themselves have deteriorated, is even more disordered. Left on its own, a system — even a bubble universe — will naturally go this way. We don’t often see a brick mansion spontaneously reassembling itself from dispersed dust.
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Sun 6 Sep, 2015 03:13 pm
@oristarA,

Quote:
What does "Left on its own" mean? "For itself"?


Undisturbed by any other agency.
No outside force or influence is bearing on it.
Left alone.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Sep, 2015 09:30 pm
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


Quote:
What does "Left on its own" mean? "For itself"?


Undisturbed by any other agency.
No outside force or influence is bearing on it.
Left alone.


But a system can really be disturbed by other agency, including a universe. For example, two Princeton Physics professors thought that "the cosmos we live in was actually created by the cyclical trillion-year collision of two universes (which they define as three-dimensional branes plus time) that were attracted toward each other by the leaking of gravity out of one of the universes."
Any closed system will always be, more or less in some way, disturbed by other agency.

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/02/what-came-before-the-big-bang-two-of-the-worlds-leading-physicists-present-a-radical-theory.html
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Mon 7 Sep, 2015 03:00 am
@oristarA,

Okay, fair enough. I'm not here to discuss cosmology, nor to debate with Princeton professors, but simply to elucidate points of English grammar and usage.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Sep, 2015 06:04 am
@McTag,
Wise man. No catch-22 will be made if you are calm enough.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Is this comma splice? Is it proper? - Question by DaveCoop
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
Is the second "playing needed? - Question by tanguatlay
should i put "that" here ? - Question by Chen Ta
Unbeknownst to me - Question by kuben123
alternative way - Question by Nousher Ahmed
Could check my grammar mistakes please? - Question by LonelyGamer
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What is the subject of the sentence?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 02:20:29