0
   

"U.S. Funds for Iraq Are Largely Unspent"

 
 
dlowan
 
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2004 09:10 pm
The Washington Post reports that:

(Full story - free registratioon required: http://letters.washingtonpost.com/W6RH05A1FB28EFFA834573F9EBE320 )

U.S. Funds for Iraq Are Largely Unspent

"BAGHDAD, July 3 -- The U.S. government has spent 2 percent of an $18.4 billion aid package that Congress approved in October last year after the Bush administration called for a quick infusion of cash into Iraq to finance reconstruction, according to figures released Friday by the White House.



The U.S.-led occupation authorities were much quicker to channel Iraq's own money, expending or earmarking nearly all of $20 billion in a special development fund fed by the country's oil sales, a congressional investigator said.

Only $366 million of the $18.4 billion U.S. aid package had been spent as of June 22, the White House budget office told Congress in a report that offers the first detailed accounting of the massive reconstruction package.

Thus far, according to the report, nothing from the package has been spent on construction, health care, sanitation and water projects. More money has been spent on administration than all projects related to education, human rights, democracy and governance.

Of $3.2 billion earmarked for security and law enforcement, a key U.S. goal in Iraq, only $194 million has been spent. Another central objective of the aid program was to reduce the 30 percent unemployment rate, but money has been spent to hire only about 15,000 Iraqis, despite U.S. promises that 250,000 jobs would be created by now, U.S. officials familiar with the aid program said.

U.S. officials involved in the reconstruction blame security concerns and bureaucratic infighting between the Pentagon, the State Department and the White House for delays in the allocation of funds. By the time the Pentagon's contracting office in Baghdad began awarding contracts, the risk of kidnapping and other attacks aimed at foreign workers was so dire that many projects never began. Several Western firms that won contracts have summarily withdrawn their employees from Iraq.........."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,028 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2004 09:38 pm
You're telling me we're using their oil money to blow them out of their homes?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2004 09:51 pm
Well, hopefully we are using it to rebuild infrastructure???
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2004 09:54 pm
The blowing them out of their homes part is actually the first step in urban renewal . . . removing the debris . . .
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2004 10:18 pm
Good find, Deb.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2004 03:11 am
Ahhh So setanta
0 Replies
 
the reincarnation of suzy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2004 08:27 am
" More money has been spent on administration than all projects related to education, human rights, democracy and governance. "
Typical, huh?
Has the money actually been released? Where is it?
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2004 08:29 am
they're probably holding on to the funds for bullets for the next war.....
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jul, 2004 02:58 pm
Well, if you read on - here is one explanation - apart from the withdrawal of many foreign workers, due to the terrorism campaign:

"Officials with the contracting office contend the amount of money actually spent does not reflect the full scope of work being performed. A more accurate figure, they said, is the amount of money allocated for reconstruction work. Just over $5.2 billion had been allocated as of June 22, according to the White House budget report.

"The money that is disbursed is typically not disbursed until the work is completed, so it doesn't give the best picture of what's going on," said John Proctor, a spokesman for the contracting office. "Some of our projects take months, or even years, to complete.""


The article says 400 mil of aid money has now been spent - but 19 billion of Iraqi oil money.

I imagine that some would mount the rgument that it is Iraqi money which rightfully should be spent first?????


Anyhoo - there is lots of info about where money has gone in the article.

Halliburton got quite a lot....

It really is worth registering to read the article. It is free - and the Post has lots of interesting content.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » "U.S. Funds for Iraq Are Largely Unspent"
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 02:57:38