1
   

Does "it" refer to "the attachment"?

 
 
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 07:19 am

Context:

It was Razin, working with fellow biochemist Howard Cedar, who showed these attachments weren°Ot just brief, meaningless affairs. The methyl groups could become married permanently to the DNA, getting replicated right along with it through a hundred generations. As in any good marriage, moreover, the attachment of the methyl groups significantly altered the behavior of whichever gene they wed, inhibiting its transcription, much like a jealous spouse. It did so, Razin and Cedar showed, by tightening the thread of DNA as it wrapped around a molecular spool, called a histone, inside the nucleus. The tighter it is wrapped, the harder to produce proteins from the gene.

- Trait vs. Fate
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 1 • Views: 365 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 10:23 pm
@oristarA,
Mark: Forgotten Thread (5)
0 Replies
 
Tes yeux noirs
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 11:50 pm
Answer: "yes".
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 11:53 pm
@Tes yeux noirs,
Cool.
Thanks.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Is this comma splice? Is it proper? - Question by DaveCoop
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
Is the second "playing needed? - Question by tanguatlay
should i put "that" here ? - Question by Chen Ta
Unbeknownst to me - Question by kuben123
alternative way - Question by Nousher Ahmed
Could check my grammar mistakes please? - Question by LonelyGamer
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Does "it" refer to "the attachment"?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 08:34:40