Reply
Thu 15 Jul, 2004 02:59 pm
The family of U.S. Air Force Maj. Gregory Stone was shocked to learn that video footage of the major's Arlington National Cemetery burial was included by Michael Moore in his movie "Fahrenheit 9/11."
Stone was killed in March 2003 by a grenade that officials said was thrown into his tent by Sgt. Hasan K. Akbar, who is on trial for murder.
It's been a big shock, and we are not very happy about it, to say the least," Kandi Gallagher, Stone's aunt and family spokeswoman, tells Washington Times reporter Audrey Hudson.
We are furious that Greg was in that casket and cannot defend himself, and my sister, Greg's mother, is just beside herself," Gallagher said. "She is furious. She called him a 'maggot that eats off the dead.'"
The movie, described by critics as political propaganda during an election year, shows video footage of the funeral and Stone's fiancee, Tammie Eslinger, kissing her hand and touching it to his coffin.
The family does not know how Moore obtained the video, and Gallagher said they did not give permission and are considering legal recourse.
She described her nephew as a "totally conservative Republican" and said he would have found the film to be "putrid."
"I'm sure he would have some choice words for Michael Moore," she said. "Michael Moore would have a hard time asking our family for a glass of water if he were thirsty."
Full text here...http://www.townhall.com/columnists/johnmccaslin/welcome.shtml
Now I wonder,if his film is so important,and if he was so sure of his cause,why didnt he get permission?
IMHO,this is a VERY sleazy thing for him to do.
You may want to check on the rules for filming public events. Do you think every photo or tape that appears in the media of a public event has been approved by the people (alive or dead) that are depicted?
Ever watch the evening news coverage of a crime scene or fire? It may not be pleasant, but it ain't illegal...
Well, this was reported by the Washington Times and Town Hall, the one papers, which only print photos with given permission. (Which must be so, since no other reported this - fear, I think.)
D'artagnan wrote:You may want to check on the rules for filming public events. Do you think every photo or tape that appears in the media of a public event has been approved by the people (alive or dead) that are depicted?
Ever watch the evening news coverage of a crime scene or fire? It may not be pleasant, but it ain't illegal...
I know what the rules are,but I would think any DECENT person that wants to use this kind of film in their own works would at least try to get permission,especially of a funeral of a man that died in something you disagree with.
BTW,even the news doesnt use film of military funerals.
Excellent point,
mysteryman. One simply should not film a subject without that subject's permission.
I want my lawyer!