The mechanism of creation, choosing

You have this obsession with the word 'opinion' which I have never used. It implies equivocation of axioms, but that is ostensibly false since 'what works' is subject to fulfilment of common needs which as far as science is concerned is rooted in common human physiology rather than locally conditioned psychology. This point is particularly significant when it comes to aspects of evolution such as the finding that we have about 98% common genes with chimpanzees. Only a fool would argue that this finding was a matter of 'spiritual choice'.
Philosophers such as Rorty have pointed out that religion no longer has any place in 'explaining' scientific knowledge despite its possible role in tempering the application of that knowledge for some. The second role is parochial and therefore the only arena where the word 'opinion' has currency.

The only problem with all this is that you don't choose to love something. It's not like you walk up to a painting and normally you would love it but you decide instead to hate it.

"I would love this painting but for sake of variety I'm going to choose to hate this painting."

It doesn't work that way. You don't choose to like or dislike something. Your like or dislike is built upon conditions. These conditions are not selective conditions. There is no free will in emotional conditions. If there was then we could just always have happiness and love. Why would anyone choose to hate or be upset?

"I would normally be happy with my friends but I'm just going to choose to be angry with them."

So your attempt to use liking or hating a painting to explain it, fails miserably. You don't really understand choice or free will. I'm not surprised though, many creationists need to make stuff up to support a nonsensical idea they have.

"So the soul exists because I choose to believe that it does."

Good thing the rest of secular society doesn't actually think like this. Our court system would be terrible.

Creationist - "He is guilty because I choose to believe that he is guilty."

Lawyer - "Where is the evidence?"

Creationist - "Evidence? I don't need evidence, I just choose to decide and therefore it's true because I chose it to be."

Lawyer - "Oh that's right we don't need evidence, I apologize for asking such a silly question."

...you're still a complete and utter moron. It says love is doing the choosing. So being a total moron, you change that to choosing to love. The word beautiful is chosen. It's a word, a chosen thing, and therefore a material thing.

No kidding, the evolutionists are completely and utterly destroying all subjectivity, not just destroying religion. They are completely ridiculously evil, a stereotype of evil.

Same with you ignorant asshole. Creationism does not say that it is a matter of opinion what percentage of human beings is similar to chimpanzee. That is in the creation category, so that is a matter of fact issue.

You ******* moron, only questions about the agency are matters of opinion in creationism. Only questions about what the agency of a decision is, can only be answered by choosing the answer. And that is why the painting is beautiful is an equally valid answer to saying the painting is ugly.

I suggest you reserve your obscene language for those co-religionists of yours who daily confirm the pernicious aspects of your shared infantile world-views.

Stop lying about creationism you ******* asshole. You are smart enough to acknowledge the 2 categories in creationism, one for opinion, one for fact. Stop lying that creationists conceive of matters about creation as matters of opinion.

Your philosophical ignorance is exemplified by your simplistic use of dichotomies." Facts" are human constructions (from the Latin facere to construct). The only difference between your categories is the degree of consensus.
But I am not here to educate foulmouthed fools. This is my last response on this thread.

Of course facts are human constructions, they are models, 1 to 1 representations. And mathematics ordered by zero can make perfectly exhaustively models of anything in creation.

But opinions are chosen, and in reference to the agency of a decision. That the agency of a decision is a matter of opinion means love, hate and such cannot be modelled, because love and hate are in this category of agency of decisions. One can only express what love and hate are creatively. All already explained 3 times over to you ASSHOLE!

No, that is false. There is nothing that is, that God did not create. So God's choice is from His Own freedom and NOT from things outside Him that offer themselves to His consideration. What is is because He made it to be.

He was not forced to create but the motive is love and God is LOVE.