Okay, and by the way, you can't add some other stupid statement in your sig like "--Kickycan wrote this" added to the end of it or something. It has to be just the exact quote.
So who would you say is winning right now? I have to be honest, I have no idea what you're going to do next.
C5 to B6
kickycan wrote:Okay, and by the way, you can't add some other stupid statement in your sig like "--Kickycan wrote this" added to the end of it or something. It has to be just the exact quote.
Deal, the loser has to cut and paste the sig verbatim with nothing else in the sig.
Quote:So who would you say is winning right now? I have to be honest, I have no idea what you're going to do next.
The game itself isn't at an advantage or disadvantage. But owing to the caliber of the players involved I'd say I'm in the middle of winning or stalemating at worst.
c1-b2
What should happen on the occasion of there being an impasse? Should neither of you, or both, be forced to have the signatures?
Fair enough, but I should have thought that both of you had enough confidence in the game's not ending in stalemate. So the rules now stand as follows: (?)
Whosoever should lose the must copy the signature given by the winner, verbatim, as a forfeit.
Thus, no one can add anything to the signature, or delete anything, or do any such thing that would alter the signature.
If an impasse should arise, both players are not obliged to go through the forfeit.
If, however, one player decides to give up, they will not escape the penalty.
Whoever wins needs to accept my challenge to a game of blindfolded Scrabble.
Excellent, despite the Mafia connotations that 'blindfolded scrabble' has...
I thought that was 'blindfolded stabble'...
I'll abide by the rules as Drom has laid them out.
d8 to d6
f4-d5 (takes pawn and eats him like cheese)
. Whatever it was, people can get really aggresive about those double scores. Not a pretty sight, at all.