0
   

Nader: US should disengage from Israel

 
 
Brand X
 
Reply Tue 22 Jun, 2004 07:55 am
This seems to be in line with the Green Party stance also, but from what I can tell nobody in Washington even wants to discuss cutting support.

I don't think most of America would go along with it either.


Quote:
Jun. 22, 2004 12:47 | Updated Jun. 22, 2004 13:04
Nader: US should disengage from Israel
By MENACHEM PRITZKER


No diplomatic plan can be acceptable unless it allows for the right of return for Palestinian refugees and a full Israeli withdrawal to 1967 borders, a spokesman for US Presidential candidate Ralph Nader told the Jerusalem Post.

Nader, an independent presidential candidate, also disagrees with Israel's construction of the security fence, its targeted killings of terrorist leaders, and Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Gaza disengagement plan, his spokesman said.

"Too often the United States walks lockstep with the Israelis; it needs to think for itself," Nader's spokesman added.

On Saturday, Nader called on the Bush Administration to stop backing Israel's policies regarding the Palestinians. In a statement to the Emirate al-Khalij newspaper, Nader said that Israeli officials "control" the White House, and coerce American leaders to supply them with billions of dollars in arms and support.

US election experts believe that the 70-year-old Nader will only play a "spoilers" role in the election. In the 2000 US Presidential election, Nader is thought to have 'spoiled' Democratic candidate Al Gore's chances of winning the presidency.


Source

A recent Nader interview:

Excerpt
Quote:


Source
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 581 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Jun, 2004 08:05 am
Hmmh, just seems that only Arab media and JP refer to this statement by Nader.

Which seems to have been published on Friday as a statement to Emirate al-Khalij newspaper first.

His view - as far as reported by the JP and ArabNews doesn't differ very much even from that of our conservatives here.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Jun, 2004 08:34 am
Well, I guess I am out of the loop because I agree in part with Ralph Nader. I do think that we are not in any way "an honest broker for the middle east." And we ought to stop claiming that title at the very least.

I think one of the main problems is that too often we are seen as anti-Semites if we say anything against Israel. I don't think we should go the other way, but I do think we should either stop funding Israel or fund both equally.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Jun, 2004 08:55 am
Nader is right.

The Bush-Kerry Middle East policy is one of the main reasons I am voting for Nader.

If the article in the JP is correct about Nader's stance, I disagree with one thing. It seems clear that the Palestinians will need to give up the right of return in exchange for a return to the 1967 borders.

Most progressive thinkers recognize this. I believe this is Nader's stance as well.
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Jun, 2004 09:03 am
I agree with you ebrown_p.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Nader: US should disengage from Israel
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 06/16/2025 at 06:57:49