1
   

Republicans For Kerry!

 
 
Ning Wu
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Jul, 2004 10:01 am
Swolf,
Have you read anything by Karl Marx to support your statement of "If you're for John Kerry, there's no conceivable way you could call yourself a republican. I mean, Karl Marx would be a moderate compared to Kerry."
I like to hear about it. Give me some real comparisons between Kerry and Karl Marx.

Here are some sites to check out for Republicans (registered republicans and many of them have been in the party for ten, twenty, thirty years) for Kerry.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/republicansforkerry04/
http://www.republicansforkerry04.org/

Edit (Moderator): Solicitation removed.


Ning
0 Replies
 
swolf
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Jul, 2004 07:47 pm
Ning Wu wrote:
Swolf,

I like to hear about it. Give me some real comparisons between Kerry and Karl Marx.

Ning


When Kerry actually shows up to vote, i.e. when his gigolo business permits, he is on the left side of nearly all issues:

http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200401220835.asp

Fortunately as the article notes, Kerry showing up to vote is rare.

When you vote for a president, you're not just voting for the one guy; you're voting for the political party he represents; in other words, you'd have to compare Karl Marx and his immediate associates to Kerry and the present leadership of the democrat party.

There would be a long list of comparisons and I suspect most if not all of the would favor old Karl.

Karl Marx never raped anybody, to my knowledge at least.

Karl marx's associates and people around him didn't die under mysterious circumstances on a regular basis.

Karl Marx didn't ride horses off bridges.

Karl, to my knowledge at least, never sold his country out to foreign powers for campaign donations.

I mean, the democrat party at this juncture has come to represent every sort of political pathology in the land and, in a land of 260 million people, that's a lot of pathology. You've got the environmental whacko/animals are more important than people crowds who refuse to let us drill for oil, mine coal or build dams or even keep dams which have been there for decades, you've got the later-day racists of PC and shakedown artists like Jesse Jackson, you've got the NEA, the trial lawyers' guild, George Soros, Michael (Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life) Moore, the anti-gun lobbies, guys like Algor who want to eliminate the internal combustion engine, and then you've got the gangsterism wing of the dem party including the Clintons and Terry MacAuliffe, the New World Order crowd which wants to turn our country over to the UN and Kofi Anan, who's basically the Don King of international relations, and it just never ends.

Granted communism became the primary focus of evil in the world for a time during the 1900s, but you can't say that it incorporated EVERY pathological tendency in Russia. I think the democrats are worse.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Jul, 2004 08:01 pm
Swolf, if SealPoet for some reason can't make it, I will be more than happy to cancel your vote by voting for Kerry. Even if he does make it, which I'm certain he will, I will be voting for Kerry anyways so now your down by one.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Jul, 2004 09:13 pm
Acquiunk wrote:
Swolf, if SealPoet for some reason can't make it, I will be more than happy to cancel your vote by voting for Kerry. Even if he does make it, which I'm certain he will, I will be voting for Kerry anyways so now your down by one.


Sure you don't want to vote for Nader or Cobb?

BTW, I'll be voting for Bush so now you and SealPoet's votes have been neutralized. No reason for you guys to even go to the polls.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Jul, 2004 10:20 pm
Every time I see "Republicans For Kerry!" I can't help but think "Chickens For Colonel Saunders."
0 Replies
 
swolf
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Jul, 2004 03:05 am
Here's a fairly good rundown of the kind of thing I'm talking about:

http://www.americandaily.com/article/2963

Quote:

Michael Moore's Democratic Party
By John Hawkins (07/03/04)

"(U)nhinged and creepy lunacy is spreading like a virus through the left and not just on the fringes. Snapping them out of it is nearly impossible. Reminding them of 9/11 doesn't help, it's already an irrelevant historical event to them that no longer has anything to do with what we're doing today. They will generally admit that Saddam Hussein is dangerous, but their words have the hollow ring of a mental patient telling a doctor that, 'I really don't think I'm Jesus anymore so can you please take the straitjacket off?' They're so paranoid that Conservatives can never get through to them. In fact, just mentioning this editorial to them will probably cause them to start screaming, "police state, police state, police state" while they start looking for the brown shirts who they believe are about to haul them away to a FEMA internment camp." -- John Hawkins

Little did I know back in October of 2002, when I wrote that, how thoroughly that "unhinged and creepy lunacy" would permeate the ranks of the Democratic Party. Back then, for the most part, I was talking about left-wing columnists and forums. But today, the Democratic elite, Congressmen, Senators, even John Kerry, the Democrat's candidate for President, are all drifting deeper into the fever swamps of the left.

If you want evidence of this, you need look no further than the reaction to Michael Moore. Moore's books sell like wildfire and his latest film, "Faherenheit 9/11," spent a week at the top of the box office. Without question, Moore is talented, witty, and funny. He's also a conspiracy nut who not only believes that we went to war with Afghanistan for oil, but that the US government is deliberately letting Osama Bin Laden run free. He has also claimed that there is no "terrorist threat in this country," that Americans "are possibly the dumbest people on the planet," and he has also compared the insurgents in Iraq, you know the ones that are sawing people's heads off, to the Minutemen from the Revolutionary War. In short, Michael Moore is an America hating whack-job.

You'd think prominent Democrats wouldn't want anything to do with Michael Moore, but au contraire, Moore is the belle of the Democratic ball!

During the Democratic primaries, Moore appeared on stage with one time front runner Wesley Clark, who was later mentioned by the press as a possible running mate for John Kerry.

Guests for an opening night screening of Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" last week included Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, Montana Sen. Max Baucus, South Carolina Sen. Ernest Hollings, Michigan Sen. Debbie Stabenow, Florida Sen. Bill Nelson, New York Rep. Charles Rangel, Washington Rep. Jim McDermott, & Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe. Afterwards, McAuliffe raved about the movie, replied in the affirmative when asked if it "was essentially fair and factually based," and seemed to sign on to Moore's bizarre claim that we invaded Afghanistan after 9/11 in order to put in an oil pipeline.

So if the creme de la creme of the Democratic Party are willing to appear with Michael Moore and endorse his movies, is it not fair for us to wonder if they endorse his other views? For example, does Charles Rangel believe that the people who decapitated Paul Johnson are comparable to the Minutemen who helped free this country from the British? Is it possible that Tom Daschle believes Americans are quite possibly the stupidest people on the planet? Could Tom Harkin think we're allowing Osama Bin Laden to run free? Maybe they believe those things or maybe they don't, but in any case, they certainly don't mind associating with and endorsing someone who has put forth those ideas. What does that say about them?

Furthermore, what does the fact that John Kerry has chosen to link to the Democratic Underground from his website say about him? For those of you who are unfamiliar with the "DU," it's a left-wing website with very popular forums that is often quoted from by conservative bloggers and radio hosts because it's such a cesspool of lunacy. If you're looking for people who think Americans are just as bad as Al-Qaeda, the US Gov't had Nick Berg killed, or just a little America trashing, there's no better place on the internet to go than the Democratic Underground. Yet, the man who wants to be our next President feels that's an appropriate web page to endorse via a link on his own site. How bizarre is that?

Moreover, examples of distinguished Democrats who're expressing these sort of sentiments have become common. MoveOn.org, a powerful member of the "shadow Democratic Party" that has spent more than 17 million dollars on ads this campaign cycle, chose to post a web-ad on their front page that claimed Bush was another Hitler.

Congressman James Moran in effect said that "leaders of the Jewish community" were controlling whether or not we went to war in Iraq.

Washington Rep. Jim McDermott said the Bush administration knew where Saddam Hussein was, but waited until a political opportune time to capture him.

Then there's Al Gore, who in his most recent public speech said,

"The (Bush) Administration works closely with a network of rapid response digital Brown Shirts who work to pressure reporters and their editors for undermining support for our troops."

That's right, the man who used to be the Vice President of the United States apparently views people who send emails to newspapers because they're concerned about the troops as the moral equivalent of the street thugs who savagely beat and murdered Hitler's political adversaries. It simply boggles the mind.

If the Democratic Party wants to treat the conspiracy theorists, America haters, and people who think Bush is another Hitler like one of their valued constituency groups, so be it, it's a free country. But, if you roll around in the slop enough times with a bunch of pigs, at some point people have to start wondering if you're doing it because you actually like the dirt and the smell. How many more trips to the pigpen can voters tolerate before start to seriously question whether the Democratic elite in Washington can be trusted to lead because they're too far out of the mainstream?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/01/2024 at 10:00:21