Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

Like you did when you said I should bury a child and then talk to you? Get off your high horse.

Once I knock you off yours, I will.

That's original. And I am only pointing out hypocrisy and dishonesty.

ou afe roughly 150 years behind the times. Climaate of course changes naturally. Humans spent thug=sands of years having only marginal effect on climate (desertification is CHnge in climate, NDS WE Hve cused it for several thousand YErs with agriculatural pastorl activites0. bUT that changed with the industrial revolutsion and huge growths in opulaion. wE HAVE CONSUMED the carbon naturally sequestered over millions of years in the form of fossl fuel and it has increased the CO2 in the atmosphere by atird . CO@ is a grfeenhouse gas. It traps heat. GThe temp is rising, and its changein fainfall patterns, snowmel, and river runoff. ///////////////We know the CO2 h INCREASED. wE HAVE PROVED ITS HUMAN ORIGINATED.

hAF THE WORLDDS CO2 production is from China, he US and the UK.]Dhina prouces about twice our CO2 NOW (but only in the last ten years. They also have four times our population, which means the average Chinese produces HALF the CO2 the average American does. For sheer self-pfservaation and sheer self-interest, we have to change. Mexico or Bolivia have negligible effect on the future. We have a great effect. And from sheer self-interest in not damaging our own agriculaural and industrial productivity we have to lead the change. Alleged resdistribution of wealth is wholly irrelevant as well as being shey.er fantas

Fraudulent data does not impress me.

What is fraudulent about it?

It's not an appearance in one of Donald Trump's fever dreams.

The data are correct. Whar is incorrect is oralloy.

Pretty much the only people left who deny the reality of warming climate change are the hard-right extremists who think thqt everything is really a liberal plot.

Where is the concern like for the children at the border? Is this soon to be dead baby somehow unworthy of concern? Cobbler is always griping about the children, what happened? Deadly hypocrisy?
http://www.conservativehq.com/article/29602-boundless-depravity-democrats

I watched half that video and he had not made a single valid point, no rebuttal at all of the science, just rant about how misunderstood he was and rhe usual false charge of political involvement. Nothing there, joint, nothing. A wasted eight minutes, not gonna waste eight more on someone with nothing to say.

Why don't you tell me one thing politics is not involved with? They are not false charges redistribution of wealth and the carbon taxes to do that are purely political.

Meh. If you want to reduce carbon emissions, build more nuclear reactors.

If you don't want to do that, then enjoy your carbon emissions.

Then why do climate nutcases have to rely on fraud to produce this data?

No. It is correct for me to not give any credence to fraudulent data.

There is data that says the problem is not as bad as is portrayed. This data is suppressed and is not considered.

So provide a link.

Links aplenty in this post:

http://able2know.org/topic/44061-850#post-4895195


To those links I can add these:

http://web.archive.org/web/20060413182310/opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/climatechange/10835291/Scientists-accused-of-suppressing-research-because-of-climate-sceptic-argument.html

America needs to go on a diet... and shed some republican politicians. Let's get this country into shape and nurse it back to health again... TC