@TheCobbler,
TheCobbler wrote:Murders with firearms
I'm sure murder victims are much better off if they are killed with knives.
TheCobbler wrote:Gun crime
I'm sure rape victims are much better off being raped at knifepoint than at gunpoint.
TheCobbler wrote:Question... Would you rather have your TV stolen or your kids shot at school? Would you rather pay for door locks and another TV or pay for a funeral?
We don't face such a choice. Your anti-freedom agenda will not prevent murders or any other crime. It will only change the weapon used in committing the crime.
But I'd rather be a free person with civil rights regardless.
TheCobbler wrote:One might also consider that, these robberies in Australia are not due to lack of guns but due to a higher rate of drug use.
Australia's armed robbery and unarmed robbery rates did not go through the roof in conjunction with any drug epidemic.
Australia's armed robbery and unarmed robbery rates went through the roof when they abolished freedom and civil rights.
TheCobbler wrote:These robberies are occurring at times when businesses and homes are unoccupied...
No they aren't. The very definition of robbery is that it involves taking directly from a person by force.
TheCobbler wrote:Oralloy, I bet your tiny brain did not consider this when comparing your Fox News rebuttal facts.
I remind you that I'm a trillion times smarter than you are.
It is a tribute to the reliability of Fox News that you start babbling about them whenever you are confronted with facts.