Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

@bobsal u1553115,

bobsal u1553115 wrote:

The Emails that Dick Cheney Deleted
By Scott Horton

Did Dick Cheney knowingly and recklessly put top secret emails on an unsecured server that could easily be hacked by foreign governments?

4 Replies

@oralloy,

No, Cheney did much worse. And we have no evidence that Hillary's server was hacked, and evidence that the State Dep't server was indeed hacked, so the country came out ahead security-wise with Hillary doing it the way she did.

Only sane conclusion: No harm, No foul.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

oralloy wrote:

bobsal u1553115 wrote:
The Emails that Dick Cheney Deleted
By Scott Horton

Did Dick Cheney knowingly and recklessly put top secret emails on an unsecured server that could easily be hacked by foreign governments?

Gosh no, that wasn't super patriot Cheney, he was content outing a CIA asset, after all, her husband wouldn't confirm their lies.

2 Replies

@glitterbag,

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/05/28/valerie-plame-cia-outing-colossally-stupid/

That's right: Cheney outing of Valerie Plume was COLOSSALLY STUPID. But, we all knew he was stupid; the world knows he's stupid.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

You mean like the way he exposed Valerie Plame???????

Why in the hell wouldn't the conceited son of bitch do it? How in the heck are we supposed to find out, dummy? He freaking DELETED them!!!!!!!

1 Reply

1 Reply

@bobsal u1553115,

excellent find

0 Replies

@Blickers,

Blickers wrote:

And we have no evidence that Hillary's server was hacked, and evidence that the State Dep't server was indeed hacked, so the country came out ahead security-wise with Hillary doing it the way she did.

Only sane conclusion: No harm, No foul.

There is no way to know if the server was hacked given the lack of security features. It would have been trivially easy for any foreign government to do so however.

Leaving top secret information out where foreign governments could easily access it without us even knowing is hardly a security plus.

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

glitterbag wrote:

Gosh no, that wasn't super patriot Cheney, he was content outing a CIA asset, after all, her husband wouldn't confirm their lies.

That's a fair point. Cheney was wrong too.

0 Replies

@bobsal u1553115,

bobsal u1553115 wrote:

How in the heck are we supposed to find out, dummy? He freaking DELETED them!!!!!!!

Deleting an email won't prevent us from knowing whether an unsecured server was used.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

It doesn't matter if Hillary's email was hacked. She already ignored regulations about using person accounts. There should have been some penalty for ignoring the regulations, but Comey decided not to charge her. End of story.

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/07/a-guide-to-clintons-emails/

1 Reply

@oralloy,

There were many in Cheney's VP office that knowingly used the RNC server to send and receive emails while conducting government business. Either Cheney knew or perhaps you are arguing that he was incompetent and should be barred from ever holding office again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

It doesn't matter if Hillary's email was hacked.

It might matter to some people.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Are they also concerned about other politicians who had their emails hacked?

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

Are they also concerned about other politicians who had their emails hacked?

If the emails contained top secret information, I would expect an equal level of concern.

If the politician was merely discussing their latest round at the golf course, that would be less concerning (although it would still be good to discourage such hacking).

1 Reply

@parados,

So why didn't the Dems do investigations back in 2008-2010 when they had a majority in Congress.

1 Reply

@Baldimo,

Because they don't use the power of the government to attack their political opponents. Do you really prefer they did that?

2 Replies

@parados,

If they broke the law or even suspected they broke the law, then it wouldn't be an attack on political opponents, it would be making sure that they are following the law and to prevent others from violating those same laws.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

Quote:

If the emails contained top secret information, I would expect an equal level of concern.

If the politician was merely discussing their latest round at the golf course, that would be less concerning (although it would still be good to discourage such hacking).

How would we know their emails weren't hacked?

0 Replies

@parados,

parados wrote:

Because they don't use the power of the government to attack their political opponents. Do you really prefer they did that?

Nonsense. Abusing government power to attack their opponents is about the only thing that the Left does do.

1 Reply

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know