0
   

Was Jesus a Stoner?

 
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2003 01:54 pm
Never tought of cooties and lice being the same thing, hmm!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2003 05:08 pm
As i understand it, cooties is a first world war vintage term for lice--veterans who had been obliged to go to delousing stations after a rotation in the trenches preferred not to refer to lice, and said "cooties" instead, knowing that other vets would understand, but not the general public--Americans already had a penchant for bathing beyond that of their immigrant ancestors, and having lice was a shameful sign of impoverished ignorance. Children of later generations had heard the term, but often did not know what it meant--but knew quite well that it was a sign of shame. It is also interesting that Milton-Bradley, or some such toy manufacturer, used to make a "Cootie" game, in which the object was to be the first to assemble a very insect-like plastic figurine--it has been replaced by "Mr. Potato Head."
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2003 05:11 pm
I had Cootie in the 80's, long after the birth of Mr. Spud-head (which a teacher friend of mine uses to teach high school kids genetics, but that's neither here nor there).
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2003 05:13 pm
They was still makin' it, huh?

Oh, by the by, Steve, we ain't aspeakin' no English, we is 'Mericans, we is speakin' 'Merican.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2003 05:18 pm
Speak for yourself. I'm California. I speak Dude. I shite you not.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2003 05:20 pm
Cool, dude, i am, like, so toadally up wit' that . . .
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2003 05:33 pm
whatever...
Oh! I mean, right on, bra!
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 03:05 am
I put it all down to George III (or as the Irish would say George the turd), who stupidly lost our N American colonies and hence is responsible for your corruption of the English language (somewhat ironic, being German), and President G W Bush.

Toodle pip!
0 Replies
 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 04:54 am
Usage of the Bible for promotion of certain agenda is not something new. Gay activists attempt to depict king David and Jonathan as a same sex couple. Now advocates of marijuana/hashish legalization try to prove that the Savior used drugs (I hope that God will forgive me mentioning such abominable things, I do not believe that this might have happened). What will be the next? Maybe, cannibals, pedophiles and serial rapists will try to find some alleged biblical predecessors...
0 Replies
 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:04 am
By the way, the term "kaneh-bosem" that appears in "The Guardian" article, in Hebrew means nothing except aromatic cane. As far as I know, hemp is not a cane. I guess, this term refers to a mixture of aromatic dried plants; mixed with olive oil they were used for the same purpose as perfumes and toilet waters are used nowadays (and for ritual purposes as well), and not for getting "high".
If we consider that Jesus Christ used herbal medicines to treat people, why not to assume that these were, for example, glycosides of oleander that have the same pharmacologic effect as digitalis?
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:48 am
Thanks for your vote Steissd, we are getting an interesting spread of opinion on this one.
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 09:26 am
Yikes! Both Oleander and Digitalis are poisonous in modest quantitites.
0 Replies
 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 02:04 pm
Any medication is poisonous if being applied in inappropriate way. But in case of cardiac insufficiency they may be helpful.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 03:18 pm
I once read an article on the ills and dangers of drugs and alcohol which rattled me so badly I nearly gave up reading.



timber
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 03:20 pm
hahahah!!!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 03:55 pm
timber, I know you'll never give up on reading, because you're hooked on A2K. Wink c.i.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:32 pm
you read this stuff c.i.? I go by feel
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2003 05:51 pm
Osmosis, perhaps? Wink c.i.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 09:14 am
He apparently had an incredible amount of patience....so I would say probably....

I have read about the cannibis theory....another cool book to check out is John Allegro's 'The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross.'
0 Replies
 
Col Man
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Jun, 2004 05:45 am
gives a whole new meaning to the 'burning bush'
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/30/2024 at 10:22:40