1
   

widely diffused species?

 
 
Reply Fri 30 Jan, 2015 05:17 am
1) Does "widely diffused species" mean "widely spread species"?
2) Failed to understand "fourteen in number at the fourteen-thousandth generation". fourteen in number? Supposed the species is pig, 14 pigs (in number) are understood clearly, but it is not consistent with the context.

Context:

But we may go further than this. The original species of our
genus were supposed to resemble each other in unequal
degrees, as is so generally the case in nature; species (A) being
more nearly related to B, C, and D than to the other species; and
species (I) more to G, H, K, L, than to the others. These two
species (A and I), were also supposed to be very common and
widely diffused species, so that they must originally have had
some advantage over most of the other species of the genus.
Their modified descendants, fourteen in number at the fourteen-
thousandth generation
, will probably have inherited some of the
same advantages: they have also been modified and improved in
a diversified manner at each stage of descent, so as to have
become adapted to many related places in the natural economy
of their country. It seems, therefore, extremely probable that they
will have taken the places of, and thus exterminated, not only
their parents (A) and (I), but likewise some of the original species
which were most nearly related to their parents. Hence very few
of the original species will have transmitted offspring to the
fourteen-thousandth generation. We may suppose that only one
(F) of the two species (E and F) which were least closely related
to the other nine original species, has transmitted descendants to
this late stage of descent.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 1 • Views: 545 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
contrex
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Fri 30 Jan, 2015 07:29 am
1) Yes

2 "fourteen in number at the fourteen-thousandth generation" means there were 14 modified descendants at the 14,000th generation.

oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jan, 2015 08:46 am
@contrex,
contrex wrote:

1) Yes

2 "fourteen in number at the fourteen-thousandth generation" means there were 14 modified descendants at the 14,000th generation.




It's odd. How do you know there are exactly 14 modified descendants at the 14,000th generation? Why not 140 or 3800?
contrex
 
  2  
Reply Fri 30 Jan, 2015 08:55 am
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:
It's odd. How do you know there are exactly 14 modified descendants at the 14,000th generation? Why not 140 or 3800?

I am not an evolutionary biologist, but I very strongly suspect that Darwin chose those numbers arbitrarily to help explain his theory. The text is accompanied by a diagram.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Is this comma splice? Is it proper? - Question by DaveCoop
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
Is the second "playing needed? - Question by tanguatlay
should i put "that" here ? - Question by Chen Ta
Unbeknownst to me - Question by kuben123
alternative way - Question by Nousher Ahmed
Could check my grammar mistakes please? - Question by LonelyGamer
 
  1. Forums
  2. » widely diffused species?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/01/2024 at 09:43:28