1
   

Agency Is Seen as Unfazed on Atom Waste

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Sat 12 Jun, 2004 08:21 am
Agency Is Seen as Unfazed on Atom Waste

By MATTHEW L. WALD

Published: June 12, 2004
Quote:

WASHINGTON, June 11 - The plan to bury nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain may need major revisions, but the Energy Department is pressing ahead with the project, according to some independent scientists appointed by President Bush to review the project.
The Yucca repository, near Las Vegas, is years behind schedule and the Energy Department is facing financial penalties for its failure to begin accepting waste from civilian reactor operators in 1998, as mandated under contracts the department signed with utility companies two decades ago. Many of those reactor operators are incurring substantial extra costs as they run out of storage space.
The Energy Department acknowledges some uncertainty about the design, but is promising to apply by the end of this year for a license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to build the repository.
Supporters argue that if the repository turned out not to work as expected during its first few decades of operation, physical changes could be made and that, for now, the plan should proceed.
But the design concept is vulnerable to corrosion, according to the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, a panel of scientists appointed to review work of the Energy Department.
Last year the board warned that humidity in Yucca Mountain's tunnels could dissolve salt from the rock there, which could then corrode "drip shields," metal tents made of a sophisticated alloy that are meant to keep the containers that would hold the waste dry.
The idea that the drip shields will protect the containers "is based mostly on assumptions that could be unrealistic and overly optimistic," the board said, and the Energy Department's predictions of how the drip shields would perform for thousands of years "are speculative."



http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/12/politics/12waste.html?th


I can't help but wonder if nuclear waste will someday in the future result in the poisoning of the planet and bring on the fabled Armageddon. As for the politicians being unfazed, the only thing that concerns a politician is the next election and not being "caught" in a lie.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 410 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jun, 2004 08:43 am
This is, in two days, the second example of a government advisory board producing a finding which the administration didn't like, so they just go ahead and ignore it.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Agency Is Seen as Unfazed on Atom Waste
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.16 seconds on 07/18/2025 at 05:01:02