I am looking for an ornament.

My point is that you don't know what the **** you're talking about.

Have you had success observing a photon from its side?
Tell me how you did this since you claiming to know what you are talking about.

Please all the people who think that the equals sign between energy and mass is imaginary, consult someone before posting.

That's not how it works with science though.

People don't just come up with theories and then get a Nobel Prize if no one disproves the theory.

It is up to the person who comes up with the theory to defend their theory from people who ask questions of it.

And new theories are always greeted with universal skepticism. They have to weather years, even decades, of questioning and harsh scrutiny before people begin to accept the theory as valid.

This site serves as a time stamped document. If any researcher wants to move my posts to another site, please make sure to give a2k it's share of the credit.

What I do is confirm the truth by testing everything that could make it false.
I'm not sure of your process. I can only explain mine.

This goes for the guys with the hand camera across the street.
The funny looking bridge is a model of the structure of space with the photons running through it and on the background. In the center you can see that I am working on the creation of atoms.

It takes more than the lack of negative evidence. There also has to be some sort of positive evidence that proves the theory is correct.

And even with such positive evidence, it can often be a long hard fight for a theory to be accepted.

As one extreme example, Alfred Wegener published his theory of continental drift in 1912. He spent the rest of his life publishing evidence that supported his theory, but died tragically in 1930, never knowing anything but ridicule for his ideas.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Wegener
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_drift

I think you are underestimating the amount of effort it requires to achieve mainstream acceptance of a theory.

People where asking for a explanation of the truth.
I have time on my hands so I am glad to help.

Take a minute to read petes profile, the answers to his abilities are in there, and laid out quite clearly.

Pete, no one ask you for an explanation of the truth.................No one at all.

I solve problems Mr DNA.
To solve the problem that you are having, simply stop reading my posts.

Dude, laughing, is hardly a problem.

Dude I stared a new topic for you to slander my name in. Come check it out.

Laughing is not slander.....................but it is hysterical.

Fine Mr smarty pants. Tell me, why you are not able to observe a photon, unless it impacts you?
I'll be sitting here waiting for the photons you send me, to hit my eyes.

Peter, I consider you an old a2k friend and I'm wondering if anyone answered your original question yet.

I'm not interested in the ongoing argument myself, right now anyway, and am skipping it for the opening question - I'd not heard of a nobel ornament and it sounds like a neat item for a sun umbrella.

Yes that would be cool.
I try not put too much value on the item because I want everyone to know "it does not matter who you are, if you think you can help someone with a problem, it is your duty to chip in".
But yes of course, there would be a great honor to receive such a certificate of appreciation.

Ooh wait, did I guess your gender wrong?
My bad, I should have asked Ms DNA.