I am looking for an ornament.

@peter jeffrey cobb,

Now you can stand there and try to see a photon from a side view. .............. impossible? Try using a machine.

@peter jeffrey cobb,

Hard to find a camera that can do that?

@peter jeffrey cobb,

Like a bat detecting vibrations, we see the photons that are reflected of structures. If photons carry it's own gravity, it would all be distorted.

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

I don't want to build this shelf without a reason. So if anyone can debunk pete's laws, please do so.

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

Now my requirements for having at least 2 objects of a massive scale, hitting each other to produce the charge required for our current visible Universe.
That one is just a theory.
But my other two laws stand unless proven different.

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

I don't think it will be appropriate to call that one a law just yet. How about "pete's visible Universe theory" for now.

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

pete, you just posted 9 post to yourself, or did you?

0 Replies

@peter jeffrey cobb,

Now please don't post here saying "well you are wrong because so and so told me different".
I am not telling you different.
I am asking you to prove me different.

2 Replies

@peter jeffrey cobb,

pete you are replying to yourself, are you having an argument with yourself s well?

0 Replies

@peter jeffrey cobb,

pete, no one needs prove you different, as we are all different, can you understand this?

1 Reply

@DNA Thumbs drive,

What I will do with slander posts like DNA, is use the thumbs down close post feature, so don't expect a response.
I'll be glad to answer and hear any comments that are not child like.

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

pete, you replied to yourself, multiple times and we are clearly different, all people are different. What is the slander?

PS. You already did respond, however if you would rather respond to yourself, you may do so.

1 Reply

@DNA Thumbs drive,

DNA. Dear sir, you are confused.
I am not telling you a single thing is a fact.
I am simply asking you to prove that it is "not" a fact.

2 Replies

@peter jeffrey cobb,

http://images5.fanpop.com/image/photos/31600000/Angel-fantasy-31600148-600-617.gif

1 Reply

@DNA Thumbs drive,

You see Mr DNA, if any of your slander has any validation to it, you should easily prove my laws wrong.

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

http://www.diamandis.com/peters-laws/

1 Reply

@DNA Thumbs drive,

I don't know the guy.
You do know that if my law's stand, the whole world will know your identity someday right?

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

pete, you need to publish your laws, and submit them for peer review.............

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

peter jeffrey cobb wrote:

Sure that is easy enough. For the big bang theory to work you have to compress matter.
Show me one example of a photon being crushed.
You can't because pete's second law.
Ooh wait have anyone provided any evidence against pete's laws?
No huh. Well keep trying.
Should I make coffee for the team?

The photon's rest mass is zero and their numbers aren't conserved, so the question of compressing one is nonsense. Keep trying. That Nobel Committee may find you yet. Very Happy

1 Reply

@FBM,

Aah good you agree that photons are not at a state of rest.
And your point?
Wait are you saying that E=M (big number here) is false?
Ooh you are questioning the wrong one if that is the case.
Well I am not sure what you are saying, could you explain?

1 Reply

I am looking for an ornament.

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know