0
   

I am looking for an ornament.

 
 
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2015 07:00 pm
@peter jeffrey cobb,
My models are all conclusive on the structure of space.
Every persons math or models should show the same results.
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2015 07:08 pm
@peter jeffrey cobb,
That means 100% chance of existence.
No one can get any different results.
It is a law with no exceptions.
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2015 07:31 pm
@peter jeffrey cobb,
I am trying to find an exception for the law "gravity is caused by a material separate from all other mass".
I have had no success so far.
DNA Thumbs drive
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2015 07:33 pm
@peter jeffrey cobb,
Do you live the yellow house, or in the tan apartments
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2015 07:41 pm
@DNA Thumbs drive,
I use the facilities in the tan. That is my physical address too. But I live outside observing the Universe around me and communicating with the fine people of this community.
Anyone is welcome to stop by and chat.
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2015 08:17 pm
@peter jeffrey cobb,
I am going to leave my second law open to two other substances that can carry gravitational charge.
I have not found them, but my models shows the possibility. But those are the only two other exceptions to pete's gravity law.
DNA Thumbs drive
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2015 08:19 pm
@peter jeffrey cobb,
What do you pay a month for rent, from what I can see the prices out there are astronomical..............
0 Replies
 
DNA Thumbs drive
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2015 08:21 pm
@peter jeffrey cobb,
pete's gravity law......................sheesh that's hysterical
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2015 08:24 pm
@DNA Thumbs drive,
Have you found evidence opposing pete's laws?
Or is this slandering again?
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2015 09:00 pm
@peter jeffrey cobb,
Again, I invite anyone to present evidence, to repeal pete's laws.
0 Replies
 
DNA Thumbs drive
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2015 11:17 pm
@peter jeffrey cobb,
No pete, I don't really think that I can find that......................But M&M's are good too.
0 Replies
 
FBM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 12:14 am
@peter jeffrey cobb,
peter jeffrey cobb wrote:

...
Now that the big bang concept is no longer valid...


Prove that, and the Nobel team will beat a path to your door. If you haven't got the call yet, maybe you should have a second gander at your "proof." Wink
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 12:43 am
@FBM,
It was either corny cobb or Quahog or Thumbsy who said that "antimatter doesn't exist'
So, when one of em says that the Big Bang didn't happen or has been "debunked", it shows either ,a profound ignorance or denial. Im not sure which.
FBM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 01:14 am
@farmerman,
Usually, the ignorance and denial go hand-in-hand. It's a very rare bird indeed that both understands and denies it.
0 Replies
 
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 05:19 am
@FBM,
Sure that is easy enough. For the big bang theory to work you have to compress matter.
Show me one example of a photon being crushed.
You can't because pete's second law.
Ooh wait have anyone provided any evidence against pete's laws?
No huh. Well keep trying.
Should I make coffee for the team?
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 05:24 am
@peter jeffrey cobb,
I am still working on the building of an atom. and it is a build up. Like a rolling snowball. Not a crushed into a state of rest.
0 Replies
 
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 05:33 am
@farmerman,
Well ok. My models show 100% on the structure of space.
So it should be easy enough for anyone provide proof against a structure of space. Anyone!
Let me know. Because I did not say something and said that is how it is. I said run your own tests to verify it. I already did mine.
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 05:36 am
@peter jeffrey cobb,
Now please. If you are not running any tests and just talking, please talk to someone who has run the tests so that you will have some knowledge of what you are talking about ok.
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 05:45 am
@peter jeffrey cobb,
If photons have its own gravity, the first pete's law won't work. So provide evidence debunking one and it should debunk both.
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 06:04 am
@peter jeffrey cobb,
Look it is not hard to prove that a structure of space don't exist. All you have to do is observe photons going by from a side view and not from the impact point.
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/16/2024 at 10:18:34