I am looking for an ornament.

@peter jeffrey cobb,

My models are all conclusive on the structure of space.
Every persons math or models should show the same results.

@peter jeffrey cobb,

That means 100% chance of existence.
No one can get any different results.
It is a law with no exceptions.

@peter jeffrey cobb,

I am trying to find an exception for the law "gravity is caused by a material separate from all other mass".
I have had no success so far.

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

Do you live the yellow house, or in the tan apartments

1 Reply

@DNA Thumbs drive,

I use the facilities in the tan. That is my physical address too. But I live outside observing the Universe around me and communicating with the fine people of this community.
Anyone is welcome to stop by and chat.

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

I am going to leave my second law open to two other substances that can carry gravitational charge.
I have not found them, but my models shows the possibility. But those are the only two other exceptions to pete's gravity law.

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

What do you pay a month for rent, from what I can see the prices out there are astronomical..............

0 Replies

@peter jeffrey cobb,

pete's gravity law......................sheesh that's hysterical

1 Reply

@DNA Thumbs drive,

Have you found evidence opposing pete's laws?
Or is this slandering again?

2 Replies

@peter jeffrey cobb,

Again, I invite anyone to present evidence, to repeal pete's laws.

0 Replies

@peter jeffrey cobb,

No pete, I don't really think that I can find that......................But M&M's are good too.

0 Replies

@peter jeffrey cobb,

peter jeffrey cobb wrote:

...
Now that the big bang concept is no longer valid...

Prove that, and the Nobel team will beat a path to your door. If you haven't got the call yet, maybe you should have a second gander at your "proof." Wink

2 Replies

@FBM,

It was either corny cobb or Quahog or Thumbsy who said that "antimatter doesn't exist'
So, when one of em says that the Big Bang didn't happen or has been "debunked", it shows either ,a profound ignorance or denial. Im not sure which.

2 Replies

@farmerman,

Usually, the ignorance and denial go hand-in-hand. It's a very rare bird indeed that both understands and denies it.

0 Replies

@FBM,

Sure that is easy enough. For the big bang theory to work you have to compress matter.
Show me one example of a photon being crushed.
You can't because pete's second law.
Ooh wait have anyone provided any evidence against pete's laws?
No huh. Well keep trying.
Should I make coffee for the team?

2 Replies

@peter jeffrey cobb,

I am still working on the building of an atom. and it is a build up. Like a rolling snowball. Not a crushed into a state of rest.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

Well ok. My models show 100% on the structure of space.
So it should be easy enough for anyone provide proof against a structure of space. Anyone!
Let me know. Because I did not say something and said that is how it is. I said run your own tests to verify it. I already did mine.

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

Now please. If you are not running any tests and just talking, please talk to someone who has run the tests so that you will have some knowledge of what you are talking about ok.

2 Replies

@peter jeffrey cobb,

If photons have its own gravity, the first pete's law won't work. So provide evidence debunking one and it should debunk both.

1 Reply

@peter jeffrey cobb,

Look it is not hard to prove that a structure of space don't exist. All you have to do is observe photons going by from a side view and not from the impact point.

1 Reply

I am looking for an ornament.

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know