Hi Vikkor. I know that you are going to tell me "that's another topic" Wink But simply it is NOT.
Hello Sky. I've made the point myself that western media is severely biased.
Unfortunately I came into this conclusion that some Americans loved to be duped and that's so bad...
Well, it's certainly one way of looking at things. My version is that western people (in general) want to believe in whats comfortable to them
, like to sprout the latest lines of propaganda, and much more importantly - are extremely lazy when it comes to doing their own research to find out the truth of things told to them
(by media, or politicians)
Whether this is just western people, or all people, I don't know for certain - my suspicion is it is all people. Your statement on Trump reinforces the idea that it is all peoples.
Why there was no shedding light on the number of times that US airplanes unloaded weapons on the regions that was under the control of ISIL and then they called it only a simple "mistake"!!!
See the blue text above
Trump in his presidential campaign said: "Hillary Clinton and Obama founded ISIS". It wasn't a simple attack. In fact it was a confession.
Err, you are aware that:
- Trump was not a politician prior to running for presidency
- was not in a position to know about such things; and
- many people believe Trump was just making up whatever he liked during the election campaign because he was 'on the biggest reality show on earth'?
If you believe that, then it's likely media bias in your own country - just like there is media bias in the west.
It is true that the american beauracracy made several idiotic decisions that contributed to the establishment of ISIS, including putting Al-Bagdadi and several other high ranking ISIS leaders all in the same prison. It's easy enough to see why they did this - it's common practice in western countries just to lump 'offenders' into prisons, and the worst ones go to specific high security prisons. Seriously, what did they think was going to happen when hardcore jihadis who had never previously met, were thrown into the same prision together? Networking.
It is worth mentioning that only 1% of Muslims are of "Takfiri" ideology. So it is not the problem with Islam
1% of 1.6B (is that the right population?) is 16,000,000 is it not. The other issue is with the percentage of supporters through to sympathisers through to those who are silenced (wont speak against them for fear of violence, social isolation, accusations of apostacy/bigotry or other effects). I have previously posted surveys of sympathisers - it is a substantial percentage.
In any event, there isn't a logical connection between your two sentences. That it is only 1% does not mean they do not follow a legitimate version on Islam. There were vast pressures put on Islam by the west in the 1800's & 1900's. And by the fact that it was only in Arabic. Islam changed a lot during those times. It certainly doesn't currently follow (as a whole) the behaviour of the early generations to go out and conquer lands.
How much successful have been the oil dollars to shut the mouth of world peace organizations?
- how does encouraging extremism help keep the flow of oil going?
- Do you have any idea how much counter-terrorism is costing western governments?
This world is the world of "actions" and "reactions". To solve the problem, we need to know who is the beneficiary of the reactions .
Yep. The problem I see with some of your views that I challenged, is there are much more credible reasons than what you are proposing. That said, I may have missed something, so I am happy for you to either explain, or for you to point me in the direction of your source.