Are there any peaceful muslim nations?

You talk about evidence, and then fail to provide any actual evidence. So far, all I see are wild claims with no back up.

The nano-thermite I haven't commented on. How about your provide a source.

https://str.llnl.gov/str/RSimpson.html

Nanoscale Chemistry Yields Better Explosives

ONE thousand years ago, black powder was prepared by grinding saltpeter, charcoal, and sulfur together into a coarse powder using a mortar and pestle. Since then, the equipment for making energetic materials-explosives, propellants, and pyrotechnics-has evolved considerably, but the basic process for making these materials has remained the same. That, however, is changing, thanks to an explosive combination of sol-gel chemistry and modern-day energetic materials research.
At Livermore Laboratory, sol-gel chemistry-the same process used to make aerogels or "frozen smoke" (see S&TR, November/December 1995)—has been the key to creating energetic materials with improved, exceptional, or entirely new properties. This energetic materials breakthrough was engineered by Randy Simpson, director of the Energetic Materials Center; synthetic chemists Tom Tillotson, Alex Gash, and Joe Satcher; and physicist Lawrence Hrubesh.

These new materials have structures that can be controlled on the nanometer (billionth-of-a-meter) scale. Simpson explains, "In general, the smaller the size of the materials being combined, the better the properties of energetic materials. Since these `nanostructures' are formed with particles on the nanometer scale, the performance can be improved over materials with particles the size of grains of sand or of powdered sugar. In addition, these `nanocomposite' materials can be easier and much safer to make than those made with traditional methods."

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade
Center Catastrophe
Niels H. Harrit*,1, Jeffrey Farrer2
, Steven E. Jones*,3, Kevin R. Ryan4
, Frank M. Legge5
,
Daniel Farnsworth2
, Gregg Roberts6
, James R. Gourley7
and Bradley R. Larsen3
...

Abstract: We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the
destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in
this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan
resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later.


The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy
dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately
100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures.

Separation
of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum
are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring
at approximately 430 ˚C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite.

Numerous iron-rich
spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these
chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.

https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf

You talked about steel and expansion of steel, using the lies of Popular Mechanics and the lies of Shyam Sunder, the lead investigator for the NIST investigation of WTC7.

There was WTC7 structural steel that was melted and vaporized. There is nothing in the US government official story [USGOS] that can account for molten, let alone vaporized WTC structural steel.

The alleged hijackers have been framed and that has been maliciously expanded to all Muslim nations.

NIST lied, categorically and in a complete baldfaced manner about the melted and vaporized WTC structural steel.

Keh - everyone knows that steel expands under heat. This knowledge hasn't been around since 9-11, I've known this since a child

Setting aside the side of the aviation fuel explosion in relation to melted steel - how do you know that metal was vaporised?

http://www.consensus911.org/point-wtc7-6/

The Official Account
No steel from WTC 7 was recovered from the collapse site, as NIST reports have repeatedly pointed out. [1]

Just as there was no reference to recovered WTC 7 steel in NIST’s Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (2008), [2] there was also no reference to the building or recovered steel in The 9/11 Commission Report (2004). [3]

Because no steel from WTC 7 was recovered, it was impossible to carry out any metallography. [4]

Accordingly, it was impossible for NIST to make any statements about the quality of WTC 7’s steel in its investigations. [5]

NIST has been able to describe the steel only on the basis of construction-related documents. [6]

The Best Evidence
There is ample physical evidence refuting NIST’s claim that no steel was recovered from WTC 7:
Early evidence of WTC 7 steel recovery was reported in a 2001 letter to JOM [7] written by three professors from the Worcester Polytechnic Institute, entitled “An Initial Microstructural Analysis of A36 Steel WTC Building 7.” [8]
In 2002, FEMA (the Federal Emergency Management Agency) published a report by the same professors describing the strange thinning and corrosion of World Trade Center steel. Sample 1 was a beam which “appeared to be from WTC7,” although “the exact location of this beam in the building was not known.” [9] When asked about this, a Senior Communications Officer for NIST said: “It was not possible to conclusively link” that steel sample to WTC 7. [10] But a statement like this from a communications officer cannot cast doubt on the evaluation of three scientists.

That the steel appeared to have come from WTC 7 was confirmed by Professor Jonathan Barnett, lead author of the FEMA study, in a 2008 BBC documentary. [11]
Appendix D of the same FEMA Report notes that “pieces that were searched for and inspected include … burnt pieces from WTC 7,” and includes a photo of a “WTC 7 W14 column tree with beams attached to two floors.” Another photo showed a “Seat connection in fire-damaged W14 column from WTC 7.” [12]

Figure-C1 [see picture at link at bottom of this page.]

It is clear from a 2005 damage study that NIST knew about the FEMA report, for it referred to “the steel from WTC7 (Sample 1 of Appendix C, FEMA/BPAT study).” [13]

In 2012, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by researcher David Cole produced several photographs of John Gross examining the WTC 7 steel in a scrap yard. Gross was the Co-Project leader on NIST’s Structural Fire Response and Collapse Analysis. [14] He had responsibility to “determine and analyze the mechanical and metallurgical properties and quality of steel, weldments, and connections from steel recovered from WTC 1, 2, and 7.” [15]
These photos were obtained by NIST FOIA #12-057, February 7, 2012, and are available in an online dataset. [16]

Figure-C2 [see picture at link at bottom of this page.]

Notice the curled up Swiss-cheese steel similar to that pictured in the 2002 FEMA Report above. [17]

The examination of steel from WTC 7 was also covered in various news stories, including two from the New York Times and one from Worcester Polytechnic Institute:

A New York Times article of November 2001 cited Dr. Jonathan Barnett of Worcester Polytechnic Institute as speaking about “steel members in the [WTC7] debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures.” [18] (The presence of inexplicably intense heat is corroborated by Consensus Point TT-6: “The Claim That There Was No Molten Steel Or Iron in the WTC Buildings.” [19])
A 2002 New York Times story noted: “Perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation involves extremely thin bits of steel collected from the trade towers and from 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story high rise that also collapsed for unknown reasons. The steel apparently melted away, but no fire in any of the buildings was believed to be hot enough to melt steel outright.” [20]

A story in the official publication of the Worcester Polytechnic Institute stated: “A one inch [steel] column has been reduced to half-inch thickness. Its edges – which are curled like a paper scroll – have been thinned to almost razor sharpness. Gaping holes – some larger than a silver dollar – let light shine through a formerly solid steel flange. This Swiss cheese appearance shocked all of the fire-wise professors, who expected to see distortion and bending – but not holes.” [21]

Now see - the Thermite story was much more interesting. Though I had to go looking for the paper itself.

No you didn't. I provided you a link in Post: # 6,701,077 on this very page.

Why are you studiously avoiding the implications of the US military labs discovery of how to make nanothermite and of the discovery of unreacted particles of the same US government nanothermite and the by products of these nanothermite reactions?

You still are avoiding all the myriad impossibilities and you are making light of a very serious issue. There were no hijackers as alleged by the Bush administration

I'm not avoiding anything. I'm withholding judgement on such theories, because I don't think sufficient evidence exists to make them credible. In particular, there seems no comprehensible motives in existence, to make them credible.

What we know for sure are that planes crashed into the twin towers, and they then came down, . What we know is the collapse started in both towers, around where each plane crashed into the buildings. This alone makes the collapse of the building, caused by the crashes, as by far the most likely cause.

In any event, the study itself has a number of flaws from a conspiracy theory point of view:

- The study didn't disclose the sources of the samples. It instead provided vague references to having obtained the samples from WTC dust.

As you are a conspiracy theorist, believing in large scale lies - I'm sure you have a problem with this. Unless of course it's only problems with things that don't meet your ideology.

- it makes no claims to how it would be used to bring down a building like the WTC
- it makes no claim to how much nano-thermite would be needed (it could be massive amounts, given the amount of steel in the WTC)
- it makes no claim to how fast it works, which would be imperative to your claims

- it doesn't appear to make any claims to 'vaporising' other metal. Vaporising btw, does not just mean burning off (which would take some time), but almost instantaneously burning steel into burnt material

Btw, you should start your own thread on this stuff. It is misplaced discussing it here.