@hawkeye10,
A typical accusatory Hawkee Post.:
Were dealing with 15 year old technology. At the time, the US was the only ones with a nuclear generator (RTG's) which uses plutonium. SInce US was an original prtner and then dropped out because of budget constraints, the ESA decided to "go it all alone" and rely on photovoltaic tech of that era (todays PV tech is about 5 times better)
ANother reason is that, when the US was part of it, the projects would have used bigger boosters which could have handled a plutonium reactor but when the US pulled out, ESA had a max pyload problem and nuke batteries were just out.
I have not said anything about how long it wuld have taken to consier the safety issues in the various member legislatures. I think Germany woulda had a cow with a nuke battery.