8
   

Size of Universe

 
 
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 11:58 am
If the furthest object we can see is around 13 billion light years away, does that mean the Universe might be 26 billion years in diameter
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 8 • Views: 3,322 • Replies: 63
No top replies

 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 12:17 pm
The furthest object whose distance has been reliably measured is whatever caused a gamma ray burst called GRB 090423 and it is approximately 13.035 billion light years away. However the size of the Universe is unknown; it may be infinite. The region visible from Earth (the observable universe) is a sphere with a radius of about 46 billion light years, based on where the expansion of space has taken the most distant objects observed.
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 12:50 pm
@dalehileman,
No, it just means we only have the ability to see things that are that many light years away from us. Future technologies and explorations may reveal a lot more that we have yet to be able to see.

The universe didn't suddenly expand when telescopes were invented, the limits of our ability to see content in the universe expanded.
Quehoniaomath
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 01:11 pm
it is assumed here that c the speed of light is constant of course.
But it isn't.
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 02:13 pm
@contrex,
Quote:
However the size of the Universe is unknown; it may be infinite.
Yea Con, thanks, and so I understand. But the idea has always bothered me because if infinite, then the chances at any moment of identical happenings (or near-identical if the whole thing is truly analog) is also infinite, which means that there are an infinite number of near-identical Universes in which Dale is chatting with Con. Don't know why this should bother me but it does

Quote:
46 billion light years, based on where the expansion of space has taken the most distant objects observed
Thanks again, had forgot about that detail
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 02:18 pm
@Butrflynet,
Quote:
No, it just means we only have the ability to see things that are that many light years away from us
Yea thanks But, I do understand that, I was merely speculating on a possibility
0 Replies
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 02:20 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Quote:
it is assumed here that c the speed of light is constant of course. But it isn't
Hi Que. Why not start a new thread with this assertion, of course explaining your unique position
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 03:45 pm
@dalehileman,
dalehileman wrote:
Don't know why this should bother me but it does

You are not alone. Paul Davies says:

Quote:
To be sure, all cosmologists accept that there are some regions of the universe that lie beyond the reach of our telescopes, but somewhere on the slippery slope between that and the idea that there are an infinite number of universes, credibility reaches a limit. As one slips down that slope, more and more must be accepted on faith, and less and less is open to scientific verification. Extreme multiverse explanations are therefore reminiscent of theological discussions. Indeed, invoking an infinity of unseen universes to explain the unusual features of the one we do see is just as ad hoc as invoking an unseen Creator. The multiverse theory may be dressed up in scientific language, but in essence it requires the same leap of faith.


One Eyed Mind
 
  0  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 04:05 pm
@dalehileman,
Dale, the only C that isn't constant in Que's case, is his circular-logic.
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 04:55 pm
@contrex,
Quote:
Paul Davies says..
Thanks Con, apparently not entirely alone after all
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 04:58 pm
@One Eyed Mind,
Quote:
..his circular-logic
Que might be onto something but unable to express himself

One Eyed Mind
 
  0  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 05:00 pm
@dalehileman,
on something*
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  2  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 05:38 pm
@dalehileman,
dalehileman wrote:
Quote:
..his circular-logic
Que might be onto something but unable to express himself

I have dubbed him QueefOnMyBreath. For a reason. He is a dick. An idiot. A troll. One-who-may-be-safely-disregarded.


One Eyed Mind
 
  0  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 05:43 pm
@contrex,
Have you tried "Queef On My Meth"?
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 09:16 pm
@One Eyed Mind,
But, Mind, the poor fella don't you think
One Eyed Mind
 
  0  
Reply Fri 7 Nov, 2014 09:17 pm
@dalehileman,
Don't you mean Poor Fellatio?
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 8 Nov, 2014 01:15 am
@dalehileman,
Quote:
Hi Que. Why not start a new thread with this assertion, of course explaining your unique position


my 'unique' position is no argument. It is the fallacy of popularity you use here,

Why do peeple react so neurotic and with Ah's?

I really thought I am allowed to express my opinion here.

If the speed of light is not constant then the measurements are very very very wrong.

Why may I not write that?

Giving problems with the religion? Wink afraid to 'loose your religion'? Wink
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Nov, 2014 05:58 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Quote:
If the speed of light is not constant then the measurements are very very very wrong. Why may I not write that?
Of course you may though many of us might appreciate further detail
roger
 
  2  
Reply Sat 8 Nov, 2014 06:09 pm
@dalehileman,
Perhaps less.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Nov, 2014 03:55 am
@dalehileman,
Quote:
Of course you may though many of us might appreciate further detail


Ok, that is a much better posting and more polite!

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Size of Universe
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 05:24:21