2
   

Kerry bad For America

 
 
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 08:10 am
Open letter to John Kerry

To be an American is something more than an aspiration or an idea. Americans have a right to be led by a fellow American, not by someone who received a good part of his education in a European country; by a drifter who lived in a boarding house. Americans have a right to choose a leader who does not chase after very rich women to satisfy his political hunger, or by a looser who cut classes to learn how to fly. An American leader should be something more than an adventure seeker. A leader should actually convey a sense of core values and have roots ... not contradict himself at every possible opportunity, and show a different face depending on the audience. John Kerry is a political ghost. His "values" are invisible - his "ethic", fleeting.

Do Americans want a Mozambique-born cosmopolitan liberal first lady with a Portuguese accent in the White House? Do Americans want a Marxist/socialist woman who inherited over five-hundred-million-dollars from her former husband as our next first lady - who has been quoted as saying "No American boy or girl should have to go to war and lose their lives because of our gluttonous need for oil"? The same woman who owns three SUV's!? The same woman who said that "Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with terrorism"? Who are you people? ?'What' are you?

Bush bashers who criticize the way he handles the press and gives speeches are contradicting themselves. To those critics who say "Politics is an art form, and ?'therefore' things are said in a certain way to please the crowd", etc. This kind of thinking is way off the mark and was expressed in a letter I recently received from a friend. When on the subject of flip-flopping she said "Welcome to the world of politics, that's the nature of the game and if you haven't figured that out yet hopefully you will soon. EVERYBODY including good old George Bush plays to the crowd. They set up to be the most appealing to the audience". Quite revealing, I thought. If entertainment is what you are looking for then hire a magician, not a president. For those old enough to remember the television program To Tell The Truth: where there were three people associated with a story, and the panelists had to guess who was the real person involved. At the end of the program, the host would ask "Will the real, (so and so), please stand up"! I get the same sensation listening to John Kerry as I did from watching To Tell The Truth. You just don't know who the real John Kerry is because he refuses to tell you. He puts on a different face for different crowds, and in the process makes a fool out of himself. Kerry is not even true to his own religion. So how is it possible to have faith in a man who has no faith in himself? He's just playing to the liberal elite who are picking up the tab for his campaign. Maybe he's pulling one over on them. Who knows? I don't even think John Kerry knows.

No, George Bush isn't perfect. We all have problems and we all fall from grace every now and then. But that's not the point. The point is that I know who Bush is because he wears the same face for everyone. I know what to expect from Bush because he is consistent. He has character. I recall Bush's eyes watering up on television once as he was discussing his fellow American victims of 911. I don't even have to like him, but at least I know what to expect. Kerry puts one on edge because you don't know what his next move is. Why do we look up to people in the first place? We want a leader that we can admire, or for someone else to set an example for us and for our children. Do we want our commander-in-chief to allow his own daughter to show off her breasts at a film festival the way John Kerry's daughter did recently? >> http://www.strangecosmos.com/content/item/100009.html << That's not the kind of leader I want, and I pity those who do. One wonders if this was not a deliberate side show in the Kerry campaign to attract supporters. Sexual promiscuity, enormous wealth, political invisibility, and the looming Marxist/socialist leanings threaten business interests, the image of Americana, American values, and the stability of the family environment. Is this what we ?'really' want? Or are we so caught up in republican this and democrat that, that we can no longer see the light at the end of the tunnel.

If, hypothetically, a child old enough to understand something about politics turns to his Kerry-supporting mom and asks "Mommy, what does John Kerry believe" ... then how is it possible for that parent to convey something of value to the child, given the moral relativism that is so pervasive in Kerry's policies.


John Kerry is a rogue member of the Skull and Bones society at Yale. The difference between Kerry and other members of Skull & Bones is that Kerry betrayed its philosophy by constantly speaking out against Vietnam. Kerry is not a team player. Bush did not serve in Vietnam but wished he had. Kerry did serve but wished he hadn't. John Kerry applied for navy patrol boat duty in Nam, because he was mesmerized by John F. Kennedy's sailing and philandering. Kerry explains his yen for adventure when he said, "I cut classes, I didn't do much. I spent a lot of time learning to fly". Obviously, Kerry's hunger for power is not based on a love, or loyality for American values (or his wife's) ... they are based on recklessness and a sense of adventure. I would hate to see a family of pigs like this in the White House!

This situation is remarkably similar to what we had in 1963 when the ungrateful and self righteous Kennedy clan was also threatening to become a monarchy on American soil. So far, Kerry has succeeded in threatening to reconstitute the failed liberal bureaucracy of a bygone era. And for what it is worth, like the Kennedy's, Kerry has also succeeded in angering the Catholic Church. Politics makes for strange bedfellows.




Philip
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 2 • Views: 4,545 • Replies: 45
No top replies

 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 08:42 am
I don't like him either, but could care less where he was educated.

Core values? Still looking, but not finding.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 08:45 am
He thinks sticking to one side of an issue is for suckers.
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 08:45 am
Oh Jeez... with a name like "KerryGoHome", I'm sure we're going to get some real level headed arguments from this guy Rolling Eyes


**edit**
I just read the "open letter to John Kerry". My above statement was on point. The letter is a load of sh*t. I'm sure someone here will parse it and take it apart piece by piece. I'm looking forward to it.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 08:47 am
Haven't we always, Observer?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 08:47 am
That's attacking the messager instead of the message JustanObserver...
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 08:56 am
Quote:

Do we want our commander-in-chief to allow his own daughter to show off her breasts at a film festival the way John Kerry's daughter did recently?


Who wouldn't want this?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 09:25 am
Re: Kerry bad For America
KerryGoHome wrote:
Do Americans want a Mozambique-born cosmopolitan liberal first lady with a Portuguese accent in the White House?

Oh my god that would be awful, wouldnt it? Mozambique-born! With a Portuguese accent!

KerryGoHome wrote:
Bush did not serve in Vietnam but wished he had.

Like hell.

That would explain all those letters that were found in which GWB was adamantly insisting he'd be sent to Vietnam as well -- I mean, seeing how diligently he attended every single day of his service at home, trying to prove how eager he was ...

KerryGoHome wrote:
This situation is remarkably similar to what we had in 1963 when the ungrateful and self righteous Kennedy clan was also threatening to become a monarchy on American soil.

That's funny ... Lessee, George Bush Senior, George Bush Junior, Jeb Bush ...
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 09:45 am
Re: Kerry bad For America
nimh wrote:
KerryGoHome wrote:
Do Americans want a Mozambique-born cosmopolitan liberal first lady with a Portuguese accent in the White House?

Oh my god that would be awful, wouldnt it? Mozambique-born! With a Portuguese accent!

KerryGoHome wrote:
Bush did not serve in Vietnam but wished he had.

Like hell.

That would explain all those letters that were found in which GWB was adamantly insisting he'd be sent to Vietnam as well -- I mean, seeing how diligently he attended every single day of his service at home, trying to prove how eager he was ...

KerryGoHome wrote:
This situation is remarkably similar to what we had in 1963 when the ungrateful and self righteous Kennedy clan was also threatening to become a monarchy on American soil.

That's funny ... Lessee, George Bush Senior, George Bush Junior, Jeb Bush ...


Now that is a good response!
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 09:45 am
Re: Kerry bad For America
This is kind of fun. Hardcore rants (from the right or left) are always entertaining...

KerryGoHome wrote:
No, George Bush isn't perfect. We all have problems and we all fall from grace every now and then.


As his past DUI and cocaine possession demonstrates.

KerryGoHome wrote:
But that's not the point.


Well, its not "the point" when its about Bush at least.

KerryGoHome wrote:
The point is that I know who Bush is because he wears the same face for everyone. I know what to expect from Bush because he is consistent.


Consistency is great...in a refrigerator or a car. I respect the ability to "stick to it" when its appropriate. But there are times when you have to make changes to best deal with a situation (this is my second biggest problem with Bush). As the phrase goes, "When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging!"

KerryGoHome wrote:
He has character.


I think that was a misprint. It meant to say "He IS a character"

KerryGoHome wrote:
Bush did not serve in Vietnam but wished he had


Didn't Bush request NOT to be sent over to 'Nam?

KerryGoHome wrote:
Do we want our commander-in-chief to allow his own daughter to show off her breasts at a film festival the way John Kerry's daughter did recently?


No, we want them to get piss drunk and make fools of themselves at parties, and have them send secret service to pick up their boyfriends from county jail after being arrested for public intoxication.

Laughing
0 Replies
 
KerryGoHome
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 10:43 am
Monarchy
The Kennedy's had over one hundred members in their immediate family. The patriarch, Joe Kennedy, had Mafia business ties and was a Nazi sympathizer. Joe Kennedy's Mafia ties were in theory and practice, undermining the stability of the United States Government: especially through Mafia tactics that ran counter to various federal laws and regulation. Joe Kennedy made a pact with the devil, and understood that he could never make it to president. So he pushed his three sons for the title. When Bobby Kennedy released The Enemy within: The McClellan Committee's Crusade Against Jimmy Hoffa and Corrupt Labor Unions, it was made official that the Mafia could no longer expect to court favor with the Kennedy family. From coast to coast the Kennedy's made everybody angry (including the Catholic Church), and, as it turns out, there was a collective interest in their removal.

One difference between the Bush family and the Kennedy's is that the Kennedy's were threatening to become an active monarchy on American soil -- while the Bush's are simply a dynasty: a succession of rulers of the same family. Therefore, in the ladder case power is limited and decentralized.

Philip
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 10:57 am
Attacking Kennedy in order to attack Kerry is not only misleading, it's downright dumb. You talk about a Kennedy monarchy, but the Bush family's involvment in the Carlyle group is much more damning.

You say you don't know who the real Kerry is because he refuses to tell you. Just how do you feel about Bush? He has lied, lied, and lied again, and used the dirtiest tactics possible to scare people into supporting his policies.

Do you really believe the caring, outward face he shows is the real man? If so, I'm sorry for you. Examine his statements deeper. Look into his past. You have to look deeper than the surface of issues, man...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
KerryGoHome
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 11:03 am
Re: Kerry bad For America
McGentrix wrote:
nimh wrote:
KerryGoHome wrote:
Do Americans want a Mozambique-born cosmopolitan liberal first lady with a Portuguese accent in the White House?

Oh my god that would be awful, wouldnt it? Mozambique-born! With a Portuguese accent!

KerryGoHome wrote:
Bush did not serve in Vietnam but wished he had.

Like hell.

That would explain all those letters that were found in which GWB was adamantly insisting he'd be sent to Vietnam as well -- I mean, seeing how diligently he attended every single day of his service at home, trying to prove how eager he was ...

KerryGoHome wrote:
This situation is remarkably similar to what we had in 1963 when the ungrateful and self righteous Kennedy clan was also threatening to become a monarchy on American soil.

That's funny ... Lessee, George Bush Senior, George Bush Junior, Jeb Bush ...


Now that is a good response!


The Kennedy's had over one hundred members in their immediate family. The patriarch, Joe Kennedy, had Mafia business ties and was a Nazi sympathizer. Joe Kennedy's Mafia ties were in theory and practice, undermining the stability of the United States Government: especially through Mafia tactics that ran counter to various federal laws and regulation. Joe Kennedy made a pact with the devil, and understood that he could never make it to president. So he pushed his three sons for the title. When Bobby Kennedy released The Enemy within: The McClellan Committee's Crusade Against Jimmy Hoffa and Corrupt Labor Unions, in 1960, it was made official that the Mafia could no longer expect to court favor with the Kennedy family. From coast to coast the Kennedy's made everybody angry (including the Catholic Church), and, as it turns out, there was a collective interest in their removal.

One difference between the Bush family and the Kennedy's is that the Kennedy's were threatening to become an active monarchy on American soil -- while the Bush's are simply a dynasty: a succession of rulers of the same family. Therefore, in the ladder case power is limited and decentralized.

Philip
0 Replies
 
KerryGoHome
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 11:05 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Attacking Kennedy in order to attack Kerry is not only misleading, it's downright dumb. You talk about a Kennedy monarchy, but the Bush family's involvment in the Carlyle group is much more damning.

You say you don't know who the real Kerry is because he refuses to tell you. Just how do you feel about Bush? He has lied, lied, and lied again, and used the dirtiest tactics possible to scare people into supporting his policies.

Do you really believe the caring, outward face he shows is the real man? If so, I'm sorry for you. Examine his statements deeper. Look into his past. You have to look deeper than the surface of issues, man...

Cycloptichorn


Quite the cynic...
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 11:16 am
You do realize that saying 'quite the cynic' does not address any of my points whatsoever.

Attacking the messenger is the oldest tactic in the book when you know you have no ground to stand on.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 11:22 am
ebrown_p wrote:
Quote:

Do we want our commander-in-chief to allow his own daughter to show off her breasts at a film festival the way John Kerry's daughter did recently?


Who wouldn't want this?


what's the difference between that and your underage fall down drunk daughters making a spectacle of themselves in public? Kerry's daughter is 30 and well past the age where Mr. Kerry has any control over her clothing choices, whereas a minor child you're supposed to exercise some control over, so that is bullshit.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 11:29 am
Oh yeah, I forgot. Cheney's daughter is a Lesbian.

Now is that really who you want running your country? Hmmm?

Your argument = flat.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 11:39 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Oh yeah, I forgot. Cheney's daughter is a Lesbian.


Waitaminute...Dick Cheney's daughter is a lesbian, too!

Imagine if the two of them were to wind up together.

Scandalous! Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 11:45 am
Re: Monarchy
KerryGoHome wrote:
The Kennedy's had over one hundred members in their immediate family. The patriarch, Joe Kennedy, had Mafia business ties and was a Nazi sympathizer. Joe Kennedy's Mafia ties were in theory and practice, undermining the stability of the United States Government: especially through Mafia tactics that ran counter to various federal laws and regulation. Joe Kennedy made a pact with the devil, and understood that he could never make it to president. So he pushed his three sons for the title. When Bobby Kennedy released The Enemy within: The McClellan Committee's Crusade Against Jimmy Hoffa and Corrupt Labor Unions, it was made official that the Mafia could no longer expect to court favor with the Kennedy family. From coast to coast the Kennedy's made everybody angry (including the Catholic Church), and, as it turns out, there was a collective interest in their removal.


No similarity with the Kerry's there, then. Wonder why any was implied.
0 Replies
 
KerryGoHome
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2004 12:21 pm
Re: Monarchy
nimh wrote:
KerryGoHome wrote:
The Kennedy's had over one hundred members in their immediate family. The patriarch, Joe Kennedy, had Mafia business ties and was a Nazi sympathizer. Joe Kennedy's Mafia ties were in theory and practice, undermining the stability of the United States Government: especially through Mafia tactics that ran counter to various federal laws and regulation. Joe Kennedy made a pact with the devil, and understood that he could never make it to president. So he pushed his three sons for the title. When Bobby Kennedy released The Enemy within: The McClellan Committee's Crusade Against Jimmy Hoffa and Corrupt Labor Unions, it was made official that the Mafia could no longer expect to court favor with the Kennedy family. From coast to coast the Kennedy's made everybody angry (including the Catholic Church), and, as it turns out, there was a collective interest in their removal.


No similarity with the Kerry's there, then. Wonder why any was implied.


I was responding to McGentrix who quipped "That's funny ... Lessee, George Bush Senior, George Bush Junior, Jeb Bush" ...
In reference to his not being able to differentiate between ?'monarchy' and ?'dynasty'.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Kerry bad For America
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/06/2026 at 01:34:50