@One Eyed Mind,
. I'm with Tesla, when he warned the scientists that they would learn far more if they properly dealt with the non-tangible aspects of life in a decade than they have learned in the existence of science.
I do agree with you here.
And I understand these establishments "box in" life. I am against that just as much, but let's not confuse science & religion with scientific and religious establishments. That would then be semantics, no?
No, I am not talking semantics here and now. Science is a tool, like religion to control people, and if you look up close at 'science' you can see a lot tha resembles with religion. It's high priests like Einstein, Dawkins, Hawkins, and so on and so forth. Outsiders are not allowd in! It is a closed system, with a LOT of taboo subjects (Ufo's etc). And there is much more to it. E.g the black robes they wear at the start of the 'academic year' , has to do with "Saturn worship", that is a religion. Most of the indoctri.. oeps education institutes are run by freemasons ( religion). Well, once you start digging you see it is just like a religion, hence 'science' is NOT, free inquiry into how the "Universe works"
Far far far from it.