9
   

What has come out of 'modern physics'?

 
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 06:35 am
What if a lot that seems to be because of 'modern physics' existed many many years before "modern physics (physics after einstein till now) '?

I am talking electric, hybride car, electron theory, cathode ray tube, x-rays, mri, wireless (aka w fi). transitor, optics, telescope and so on and so forth?


Then what?
George
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 08:53 am
@Quehoniaomath,
So "modern physics" comprises all discoveries and theories in physics since
about 1916?
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 10:10 am
Was James Clerk Maxwell a charlatan? And Carl Friedrich Gauss? Names whose boots the Quehoniaomath idiot is not fit to lick.
Germlat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 11:00 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Can you define Physics? I didn't think so.
George
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 11:32 am
@Germlat,
But it is definititely worth it to define physics.
Also to distinguish between theory and application.
Germlat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 11:47 am
@George,
I agree.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 01:21 pm
@Germlat,
i have done so for 'modern physics'


But it looks you want to make this a semantic thing. it isn't.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 01:22 pm
@contrex,
Quote:
Was James Clerk Maxwell a charlatan? And Carl Friedrich Gauss? Names whose boots the Quehoniaomath idiot is not fit to lick.


where did I wrote that?????
btw the Maxwell equations are very flawed.


But I ask again, what if nearly everything supposedly because of 'modern physics' was invented years and years and years before 'modern physics' then what? And there is a reason for that, because there is nearly nothing that works because of 'modern physics, because 'modrn physics' can't work, because 'modern physics' is wrong. Very wrong.
Germlat
 
  2  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 04:30 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:

Quote:
Was James Clerk Maxwell a charlatan? And Carl Friedrich Gauss? Names whose boots the Quehoniaomath idiot is not fit to lick.


where did I wrote that?????
btw the Maxwell equations are very flawed.


But I ask again, what if nearly everything supposedly because of 'modern physics' was invented years and years and years before 'modern physics' then what? And there is a reason for that, because there is nearly nothing that works because of 'modern physics, because 'modrn physics' can't work, because 'modern physics' is wrong. Very wrong.

explain then...this might be interesting...
Voyager
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 06:41 pm
GPS couldn't be used without moderns physics corrections.
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 10:53 pm
@Voyager,
Quote:
GPS couldn't be used without moderns physics corrections.


I hope you are pretty sure about this one. Wink
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 10:55 pm
@Germlat,
Quote:
explain then...this might be interesting...


First, answer my question, please.
0 Replies
 
Voyager
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Aug, 2014 10:47 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Quote:
@Voyager,
Quote:
GPS couldn't be used without moderns physics corrections.


I hope you are pretty sure about this one.


Pretty sure I am. Read about time corrections in GPS.
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Fri 29 Aug, 2014 12:17 pm
@Voyager,
Quote:
Pretty sure I am. Read about time corrections in GPS.


I know about that one of course (And a lot of others), but it is simply not true.
It is sheer propaganda for an idiotic theory (relativity).
Voyager
 
  2  
Reply Fri 29 Aug, 2014 03:08 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Quote:
I know about that one of course (And a lot of others), but it is simply not true.
It is sheer propaganda for an idiotic theory (relativity).


Uhh! another member of CTC (Conspiracy Theory Club). Sorry for your pain.
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Fri 29 Aug, 2014 10:30 pm
@Voyager,
Quote:
Uhh! another member of CTC (Conspiracy Theory Club). Sorry for your pain.


Strange reply indeed. I am in no pain, thamk you. Why do you say that???

But I still stand after what I wrote. the GPS relativity corrections aren't needed at all. That is all I am saying but you seem to have a lot of problems with that.

I am very sorry fro your loss.






where the hell do these people come from??
0 Replies
 
Germlat
 
  2  
Reply Sat 30 Aug, 2014 06:53 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:

Errrrrrrrrr...... NOTHING!

(I define 'modern physics' after the village idiot einstein came on the scene till now.)

Nothing?

Yep, not the following: transistor, x-rays, gps, satellite, electron microscope, telescope, optics, mri, electric car , gps and on and on it goes, nearly ad infinitum!

Fascinating eh?!


What have you done for mankind? All you've done is created an online name associated with science to trap people into thinking you know something about it. Well, I figured out you don't. You are resentful of scientists, because you feel inferior.....you can't prove why. That's a question you have to explain to yourself.
Quehoniaomath
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 30 Aug, 2014 08:25 am
@Germlat,
Quote:
What have you done for mankind? All you've done is created an online name associated with science to trap people into thinking you know something about it. Well, I figured out you don't. You are resentful of scientists, because you feel inferior.....you can't prove why. That's a question you have to explain to yourself.


Nice one! Again! What have I done for mankind?????!!!
LOL, what kind of answer is this?
I am resentful? I feel inferior? All this without any proof?
Real scientific are we? My god!
You are really full of it.
I don't have to explain anything to myself.
You are very laughable in your writings.

I am only saying that nothing seems to be of "Modern physics" and it really seems you have great difficulty with that.

Germlat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Aug, 2014 08:12 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:

Quote:
What have you done for mankind? All you've done is created an online name associated with science to trap people into thinking you know something about it. Well, I figured out you don't. You are resentful of scientists, because you feel inferior.....you can't prove why. That's a question you have to explain to yourself.


Nice one! Again! What have I done for mankind?????!!!
LOL, what kind of answer is this?
I am resentful? I feel inferior? All this without any proof?
Real scientific are we? My god!
You are really full of it.
I don't have to explain anything to myself.
You are very laughable in your writings.





Bye CLOWN!
Compliments: Germlat





Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Sat 30 Aug, 2014 11:33 pm
@Germlat,
Something very deep seems to be bothering you. What is it mate?
is it this maybe:


Quote:
I am only saying that nothing seems to be of "Modern physics" and it really seems you have great difficulty with that.


especially for you thenm I will repeat my question.

Quote:
What if a lot that seems to be because of 'modern physics' existed many many years before "modern physics (physics after einstein till now) '?

I am talking electric, hybride car, electron theory, cathode ray tube, x-rays, mri, wireless (aka w fi). transitor, optics, telescope and so on and so forth?


Then what?



I am only wondering why you still haven't answered that question!

Maybe you can't ?


Wink
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 05:00:39