@hawkeye10,
Quote:Putin's stance has forced the West to choose between a rock and a hard place in the Syrian crisis. He wants the US and Europe to accept Assad as an actual partner in the fight against "Islamic State" terrorists. This would not only stabilize the Syrian ruler's regime, but also clearly boost Russia's role as a global player on the world political scene. The Western isolation of Russia, intended to sanction Russia's interference in neighboring Ukraine, would then be broken.
Or business as usual
Without an agreement with Putin, the current situation in Syria would continue unabated, with the murderous war in the Middle East driving millions more from their homes, primarily toward Central Europe.
And, thus far, the third option - a risky mission of massive Western armed forces, with ground troops in Syria lacking a UN mandate - has not been openly considered by anyone.
http://www.dw.com/en/opinion-caught-with-putin-between-the-devil-and-the-deep-blue-sea/a-18747173
Accept that Ukraine belongs to Russia and get behind Assad or else get flooded with many millions of PTSD plagued Syrians, this is the choice that Putin is giving Europe.
Sounds like checkmate to me, because the Europeans are not going to put boots on the ground to deal with ISIS, and ISIS is very good at what they do. We have been hearing for years that they will collapse on their own, but there is zero evidence to support that claim, this in spite of that idiot Obama famously calling ISIS a JV Team of terrorists.