@JTT,
It's called having a wide range of interests JTT. You should try it.
I, like many other regular visitors to this forum, comment on politics, music, films, religion, sports, history, philosophy, science, drugs, social media, business, dogs, health issues, literature, food, travel, relationships, customs, and any number of other topics. In fact, the only topics I can imagine
not commenting upon are
mathematics, celebrity gossip, and the botany of ferns. Whether this delights, dismays or stimulates no reaction at all from other members is entirely beside the point of why I do. (I take that back a bit. I admit to hoping that the advice I provide people who come to this forum with personal problems is of some help to them). In short, I'm a freaking Renaissance Man...with a big heart.
You on the other hand are strictly a
One Trick Pony. You post in almost every thread I do, but always with some variant of the same message:
The USA is a terrorist nation and the single most destructive country in the history of mankind. With great regularity, you also include an insult directed at one or more participating member:
Quote:Yes, you famously dumb bullshitter
He has also caused McTag to illustrate what a liar he is and just what a pedantic little fool he is.
The abysmally ignorant coward, Bill, asks for proof
You are a terribly confused, conflicted individual, CI. That's what comes from a lifetime of relentless propaganda. A liar too.
Don't be such a chickenshit. It is your dishonesty that you don't deal with these things honestly.
You advancing the ludicrous notion that you have the mental capabilities to assess those issues is laughable in the extreme.
There you go again, cj, wasting that grade 3 education
You're a lying Uncle Sam semen sucker, Oralboy.
You are such a coward, lordy. A miserable little coward.
Just what is your point, you simpleton!!!
It's no great shakes to be as good a speller as Farmerman, the "academic"....
Another famously dishonest know nothing arrives on the scene
How did a patently dishonest boob like you, Contrex, a known liar...
Or if you go to Rabel's house you find one of those same pricks there
You define 'insipid' and yet you haven't the smarts to lose the sig line
My apologies to those members whose JTT insults are not among those quoted above. There were just too many to choose from and I didn't want to be too voluble.
Far be it for me to criticize your use of insults, as I am a practitioner as well. I bring attention to yours only to modify my own, and illustrate that you are not actually a
One Trick Pony since you, obviously, treat us to two.
Often you'll find a way to pervert even a totally unrelated topic to provide yourself with a creaky platform. So that a discussion about whether or not pit bulls have an undeserved bad rep is used to segue into:
Quote:"The most vicious hounds on earth are nothing in comparison to the US, and yet Finn you worry about the reputation of a dog bred by the almost equally despicable British to savage bulls. What about the children in Honduras Finn, or are you too cowardly to discuss them?
Or one about the mind expanding effects of peyote:
Quote:The nightmarish visions induced by hallucinogens are nothing in comparison to the very real nightmares the world has been forced to suffer through because of the US, and yet Finn you pontificate about consciousness when you yourself have no conscious. What about the asparagus farmers in Chile Finn, or are you too cowardly to discuss them?
And if there ever was a thread on ferns in A2K; in which I happened to post, I'm sure I would find something like this:
Quote:The number of reproductive spores released during the life of any one of the 12,000 species of Pteridophyta is numbered in the thousands, but this is only a tiny fraction of the number of spores of terror, death and destruction released by the USA over the years of its existence, and yet Finn you prattle on about a plant that has more integrity in one fiddlehead that you have in your entire body. What about the Buddhist temple bombers in Afghanistan Finn, or are you too cowardly to discuss them?