4
   

I don't want you getting hurt.

 
 
SMickey
 
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2014 08:21 am
From such a big hit, 'Frozen,' I could catch the expression,

" I don't want you getting hurt.'

I've always been told 'want' can make such a good combination with 'to', like,

"I want you to go.' , 'They wanted to read books', and 'We want you to leave'.


I wouldn't have cared at all if the sentence had been,

"I don't want you to get hurt'.

My guess is that the two sentences must have some difference in nuiance, however minute it might be, and as a native Korean, I completely have no idea what the difference could've been.

If they aren't exactly the same thing, would you please help me figure out
how they are different?

Thank you.

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 4 • Views: 2,556 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by SMickey
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2014 09:15 am
@SMickey,

Quote:
If they aren't exactly the same thing, would you please help me figure out
how they are different?


They mean exactly the same. They are alternatives, and in conversation, both are equally likely. Use of "getting" is maybe a bit more colloquial.

Don't get involved.
I don't want you to get involved.
I don't want you getting involved.

All have the same meaning.
JTT
  Selected Answer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2014 10:12 am
@SMickey,
Quote:
From such a big hit, 'Frozen,' I could catch the expression,


You can't use COULD here, S. You want WAS ABLE TO.

I was able to catch the expression, ... .
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2014 10:17 am
@SMickey,
The famous linguist, Dwight Bolinger, suggested that "... to get hurt" is a bit more distant, more theoretical while the '...ing' form is more here and now, more emotive, more focused.
0 Replies
 
SMickey
 
  0  
Reply Fri 20 Jun, 2014 02:40 pm
@JTT,
Actually, I'm so stunned and even shocked to see your comment, 'could' is wrong here.

My grammar teacher told us that 'be able to' is almost interchangeable with 'can', so I've figured they are practically the same thing.

Could you please give me some hint why 'could' is not a good choice here?
Meanwhile, of course, I'll do my own research as well.
SMickey
 
  0  
Reply Fri 20 Jun, 2014 02:42 pm
@McTag,
Thank you McTag.

I wouldn't have wasted my time had I gotten your tip earlier.
God bless you.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jun, 2014 04:05 pm
@SMickey,
In English, modals are derived from verbs that did carry tense ... during a much earlier stage of the language.

The Grammar Book - An ESL/EFL Teachers' Course at page 137.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jun, 2014 04:09 pm
@SMickey,
Did McTag send you a personal message, SMickey?
SMickey
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jun, 2014 09:24 pm
@JTT,
No, I don't think so. Mind if I ask you why?
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Fri 20 Jun, 2014 09:26 pm
@SMickey,
Your post previous to this one.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jun, 2014 12:31 am
@SMickey,

Quote:
Thank you McTag.

I wouldn't have wasted my time had I gotten your tip earlier.
God bless you.


You're welcome SMickey, I'm pleased if I can help.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Is this comma splice? Is it proper? - Question by DaveCoop
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
Is the second "playing needed? - Question by tanguatlay
should i put "that" here ? - Question by Chen Ta
Unbeknownst to me - Question by kuben123
alternative way - Question by Nousher Ahmed
Could check my grammar mistakes please? - Question by LonelyGamer
 
  1. Forums
  2. » I don't want you getting hurt.
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 03/16/2025 at 12:19:46