1
   

"Under New Management"

 
 
Reply Thu 13 May, 2004 09:07 am
Will no one hold Ted Kennedy accountable for his slander of the U.S. military?
by Hugh Hewitt
05/13/2004 12:00:00 AM

ON MONDAY, Ted Kennedy took to the floor of the United States Senate and made this statement: "Shamefully we now learn that Saddam's torture chambers reopened under new management, U.S. management."

Kennedy, of course, is the alter ego of John Kerry, and is his principal backer and original sherpa to power in Washington. When Kerry's campaign was foundering, Kennedy dispatched his own chief-of-staff, Mary Beth Cahill, to stabilize and reorganize it. Kennedy has spared no effort on Kerry's behalf because Kerry is Kennedy's last chance for power on the national stage.

Given Kennedy's closeness to Kerry and his inevitable prominence in a Kerry administration, it was surprising that of the country's major newspapers, only the New York Post quoted the senior senator's descent into near-madness in Monday's speech. Last week, Los Angeles Times editor John Carroll lectured the rest of the media on the dangers of pseudo-journalism, but what is pseudo-journalism if not the protection of a major American figure from himself?

The inability to distinguish between categories of evil is evidence of the inability to distinguish between evil and good. That Ted Kennedy lacks such capacity does not surprise. What does surprise is that Kennedy's colleagues have not condemned his slander of the American military. He is equating the suffering of millions and the deaths of hundreds of thousands under Saddam, with the actions of a handful of rogue soldiers.

Where are John Carroll's "journalists?" Has even one of them gone to Kennedy to tease out the outlines of his comparison
for the public to understand? Has the Washington bureau chief of the Los Angeles Times made calls for comment from other leaders of the Democratic party? Or have newsroom cheerleaders not even noticed Kennedy's excess because they found nothing in it to be objectionable?

The barbaric execution of Nick Berg reminds us of the difference between Saddam's hundreds of thousands of butchers and America's score of rogues.

Hugh Hewitt is the host of The Hugh Hewitt Show, a nationally syndicated radio talkshow, and a contributing writer to The Daily Standard.

Link

Teddy needs to offer an apology to the military and the nation for that comment.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 804 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 May, 2004 09:16 am
How is this slander?

As any lawyer or journalist will tell you, "Truth is a defense" against any accusation of slander.

Bravo Senator Kennedy! We need more people with the balls to say what needs to be said.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 May, 2004 09:36 am
Boy, what an ironic mix tarantulas has for us this morning. Here's the piece linked in the article above...
Quote:
Los Angeles Times Editor John S. Carroll delivers the annual Ruhl Lecture as part of 'Ethics Week' on Thursday

May 07, 2004

The media industry has been infested by the rise of pseudo-journalists who go against journalism's long tradition to serve the public with accurate information, Los Angeles Times Editor John S. Carroll told a packed room in the Gerlinger Lounge on Thursday.
Carroll delivered the annual Ruhl Lecture, titled "The Wolf in Reporter's Clothing: The Rise of Pseudo-Journalism in America." The lecture was sponsored by the School of Journalism and Communication.

"All over the country there are offices that look like newsrooms and there are people in those offices that look for all the world just like journalists, but they are not practicing journalism," he said. "They regard the audience with a cold cynicism. They are practicing something I call a pseudo-journalism, and they view their audience as something to be manipulated."

In a scathing critique of Fox News and some talk show hosts, such as Bill O'Reilly, Carroll said they were a "different breed of journalists" who misled their audience while claiming to inform them. He said they did not fit into the long legacy of journalists who got their facts right and respected and cared for their audiences.

Carroll cited a study released last year that showed Americans had three main
misconceptions about Iraq: That weapons of mass destruction had been found, a connection between al-Qaeda and Iraq had been demonstrated and that the world approved of U.S intervention in Iraq. He said 80 percent of people who primarily got their news from Fox believed at least one of the misconceptions. He said the figure was more than 57 percentage points higher than people who get their news from public news broadcasting.

"How in the world could Fox have left its listeners so deeply in the dark?" Carroll asked.

He added that a difference exists between journalism and propaganda.

As he addressed some of the hard hits journalism has taken in the field of ethics, Carroll noted that anyone could be a journalist because, unlike other fields, journalism had no qualification tests, boards to censure misconduct or a universally accepted set of standards.

However, Carroll said a great depth of feeling remains on the importance of ethics that is centered around newspapers' sense of responsibilities to their readers.

"I've learned that these ethics are deeply believed in even though in some places they are not even written down," he said. When ethical guidelines are ignored, their proponents respond with 'tribal ferocity,'" he added.

"If you stray badly from these rules, you will pay dearly," he said.

He said while much media has ended up "in the gutter," the L.A. Times has a different philosophy and was dedicated to taking the "high road."

"I do think that a lot of newspaper people have made a lot of strategic mistakes," he said. "They cut back space on things people really need to know."

Carroll, whose career as a journalist spans 40 years, joined the L.A. Times in 2000, according to the paper's Web site. Under his leadership, the paper earned five Pulitzer Prizes this year.

Tim Gleason, dean of the SOJC, said Carroll is a "journalist's journalist."

"As an editor he cares deeply about the integrity of the profession and he believes that news, real news is the heart and soul of the business of journalism," Gleason said as he introduced Carroll.

University graduate student Mose Mosely had similar sentiments. He said he admired Carroll not only for his vast experience around the country, but also for his consistent commitment to his ideals.

"The depth of his integrity is very impressive," Mosely said.

Bobbie Willis, a staff writer for the Eugene Weekly, said she felt Carroll brought up some relevant issues in today's media environment.

"It really made me take a look at my career as a journalist," she said.

Willis said she understood Carroll's concerns about the state of journalism nationally, but added that many of the journalists she has encountered were very committed to accurate and ethical reporting.

Carroll had a few words of advice for student journalists; he told them to pick their boss carefully.

"Don't be lured by the money or the big name of the employer," he said, adding that journalists should not allow their integrity to be compromised by unscrupulous employers.

"Don't be a piano player in a whorehouse," he said.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 May, 2004 11:34 am
Nothing said by Teddie is to be taken seriously,especially where the military is concerned.He nevee wore a uniform,used his political influence to avoid ANY type of military service,yet he considers himself an expert on military matters.
When he sobers up,then maybe he will start making sense.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 May, 2004 12:06 pm
mysteryman wrote:
Nothing said by Teddie is to be taken seriously,especially where the military is concerned.He nevee wore a uniform,used his political influence to avoid ANY type of military service,yet he considers himself an expert on military matters.
When he sobers up,then maybe he will start making sense.


Well, the 'never wore a uniform' argument applies to everyone in this administration but for Powell, yet they clearly think themselves expert.

As to making sense once sobered up...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » "Under New Management"
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 09:13:48