If Kerry Can't Beat Bush

okay, I said enough about Bush in my posts, so just for fun I'll change subject.
Honestly - were Democrats trying to find the worst possible opponent? STILL, in any normal country Kerry would won only because he will compete against retarded Nazi that thinks that God speaks to him.
But...my question remains.

Despite my hesitations about Kerry, I've never cited 'instances of doucheitude' as the author of the website below does in "Instances of Doucheitude and Why it Doesn't Matter."

However, this is a fun site for skeptics with a serious message conveyed in a series of essays, including: "How F@cked We are Right Now," "How F@cked We will be With 4 More Years of
George W. Bush," "Why This is Not the Time or the Place to Vote for a 3rd Party Candidate" and "Why Every Conservative Should Seriously Consider Voting Democrat this Fall."

Since many of you aren't persuaded that voting for Kerry is the best (and perhaps only) shot at ejecting Bush and saving ourselves and the rest of the world, this might help.

http://johnkerryisadouchebagbutimvotingforhimanyway.com/

you are absolutely right. If I would be American I would try to beat disgust and vote for Kerry. I mean, I would vote for him, but I am not sure if I would vomit later.
So, I still haven't got answer on my question. Has Bush decided who will be his opponent? Or that's some kind of private joke between Democrats? Like, Bush is so terrible and he thinks God speaks to him, so let's bet if we choose Kerry that EVEN he can win?

I think there's been some exaggeration about Kerry's unelectability (is that a word?). I'm not thrilled about him; frankly I liked Gore better, but that's water under the bridge.

He's not an idiot and he's a lot better than Bush. I doubt that too many people will go into the voting booth unsure who to vote for...

Kerry
Kerry has a history of running lousy campaigns until near the end. He's a great closer. He must not wait too long to get into his closing mode because voters seem to be making up their minds earlier than usual.

BBB

It's a long way to November.

Why voters should be confused at all is beyond me.

I think in a fair race -- no help from Daddy's pals on the Supreme Court, or Brother Jebby in the Florida statehouse, or Die Bold voting machines, Kerry will easily beat Bush in November.

This mess just can't go on another 4 years.

One question, do you all believe that it will matter any if bush or kerry gets more votes.... bush has served his purpose and he can be discarded (IMO he will be) and kerry will be the pres come january... but here is the but.... it will be no different as far as americas policy is concerned... I have a feeling that they both serve the same masters, and believe me it is not the will of the constituents....

this is something I am afraid too yilmaz, I must admit. However, if this is case then Clinton was under same masters as well, and he was pretty bad president when it comes to external affairs, but it was not even near bad as it is during Bush Jr. era.

we know Bush, there is not one thing he has done right - he has set America back 50 years in every area, he has never even approached telling one truth.

A friend's mother who is a devote Republican said, "I would vote for the devil himself if he was running against Bush." I pointed out that Bush is Satan - she related this to her mother who got a kick out of it.

Me too osso. There is a clear distinction between the two men. The vision they each hold for the future of the United States both at home and abroad is quite apparant. Thier leadership styles are completely different. Their diplomacy styles are oppositte.

The choice I would think would be very clear. The country is more polarized than I can ever remember it being.