Myth of man-made global warming

How can you talk to me. You have said you have me on ignore. In fact you have called me names when you claimed you were putting me on ignore. I wonder why you think it is OK for you to use name calling but if others make light of your lack of facts it somehow becomes an attack on you.

But never mind you are to boring to me anyway and not able to discuss honestly

1 Reply
User ignored (view)

Renewable energy 'simply WON'T WORK': Top Google engineers
Windmills, solar, tidal - all a 'false hope', say Stanford PhDs
By Lewis Page, 21 Nov 2014...........

Koningstein and Fork - and many others - remain convinced that the dangers of carbon-driven warming are real and massive. Indeed the pair reference the famous NASA boffin Dr James Hansen, who is more or less the daddy of modern global warming fears, and say like him that we must move rapidly not just to lessened but to zero carbon emissions.

There are enough good inventions that can help (for something that doesn't exist anyway) but they are all surpressed by the same group that let's us think AGW is real!

It is all a hoax!!!!! So they can steer public opinion a certain way!

re quahog: you really have a lot of gall, accusing someone else of not being able to discuss honestly, when 99.9% of what you do is simply denial, with no facts, evidence, or discussion. Thinking 0.1% of what you do is discussion probably is overly generous to you.

What evidence do you have that they are lying? Please present a valid source that gives a different result. Otherwise we have thousands of scientists with millions of temperature readings vs your unsupported opinion. I'll stick with they guys that actually publish their database that I can check.

Nice attempt to deflect, quahog. Didn't work, though. It's apparent that you're the one who has the emperor's new clothes, not us. You once again failed to present even a shred of evidence for your denialism. You don';t even have the emjperor's soiled underpants on to clothe the nonexistence of any of your "facts". And you regard any attempt to present the knowledge that people have gained only as the totally biased epithet "indoctrination", rather than what it is, what the sensibel part of the world knows as "teaching facts, evidence, and the methods to gain it". It is precisely because we do think for ourselves that you have not, and never will, gain any converts to the absurd conspiracy theories you keep propounding.