1
   

Keeping the Promise

 
 
Reply Sun 9 May, 2004 02:53 am
May 07, 2004, 9:48 a.m.

Let's keep our eyes on the prize.

By Mahdi al-Bassam

Over the past week, the world has seen images of atrocious prisoner abuse in Iraq. There was outrage in Western Europe and the Arab world; France, Russia, and secular Arabs were particularly vocal in their condemnation of America. There were murmurs too from the United Nations.

Were it not for their hypocrisy, these condemnations would be quite stirring. But just a decade or two ago, the same groups stood by while hundreds of thousands of Iraqis were dumped into mass graves. They even supplied Saddam with lethal chemicals subsequently used against the local population. Where were those great humanitarian voices when Saddam was carrying out his atrocities?

The same Arabs and Muslims who today decry the behavior of a few American servicemen for years turned a blind eye to the mass murder, torture, and gassing of their fellow Muslims. They watched ?- and condemned America for ?- the suffering of the Iraqi people, all the while supporting the torturer himself and literally stealing food and medicine from the mouths of starving men, women, and children.

This hypocrisy speaks volumes about the people who rejected the liberation of Iraq for there own greed. Saddam's orphans are guilty participants in his most serious crimes.

If we are to ask for an apology on behalf of the Iraqi people, then we must begin closer to the source of their agony. That means getting at the underlying reasons for why the Coalition is in Iraq today and what can be done to keep the American promise of a democratic Iraq. We must find out why these governments, organizations, and individuals so vehemently opposed helping the oppressed Iraqis.

Americans will certainly look deeper into what happened and why. America must find a new level of honesty in its introspection. We must get the facts straight before we can recommend a solution; Bush has promised as much. The facts will lead us to those who committed and facilitated the torture. It is wrong to prematurely blame Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld for what we see on television, and it is absurd to reach a conclusion before all the facts are out. The battle against terror demands that we correct our errors and continue moving ahead.

As for the Iraqi people, this will be one more step toward obtaining a sovereign democratic state. It would be just for them to be included in the process of decision-making regarding this atrocity. The greatest justice would be for the Iraqi people to come out of this ordeal with a truly democratic secular state.

Bush, members of his cabinet, and the American people must hold true to the promise they made to the Iraqi people of freedom, democracy, and the chance for a better life. The president should make the bureaucracy implement his vision, and this atrocity should be turned to further strengthen the growing bond between the American and Iraqi people in their joint aspirations for peace and democracy.

?- Dr. Mahdi al-Bassam, a physician in Texas, is a founding member of the Iraqi National Congress.

Link
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 825 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 May, 2004 03:14 am
Where was indignation during Hussein's regime? - hollow outrage is little more than a pantomime

Revulsion at the revelations of prisoner abuse by U.S. forces in Iraq has spread faster than hot sand in the desert wind. No one has expressed the outrage with more horror than the American people. No one, that is, except the leaders of the Arab world.

Nothing will ever justify the actions of those charged with watching over the prisoners, and both Americans and Arabs are fully justified in their disgust. If the deeds of the jailers were not so sickening and its consequences not so disastrous, however, the reaction of some Arab leaders would qualify as humorous.

Among those expressing shock and horror at the very thought of prisoner mistreatment are governments whose use of torture is routine, in countries where human-rights organizations have repeatedly reported the torture of prisoners is ''endemic'' and ``widespread.''

Should the United States be held to a higher standard? You bet. This is one case where the double standard is justified, because U.S. forces entered Iraq on a mission deliberately hued with high moral goals.

And yet, when dictatorships that have stayed in power for decades show themselves shocked -- shocked! -- at the mere idea that a prisoner might be mistreated, there is little question that the hollow outrage is little more than a pantomime.

Throughout the Arab world -- from Saudi Arabia to Egypt and Syria, countries where a call for democracy can land you in jail -- government officials and regime-controlled newspapers have spoken of their deep disgust at what they have seen.

Amr Mousa, the secretary general of the Arab League and former foreign minister of Egypt, declared his ''shock and disgust'' at the ''shameful images'' of the naked prisoners. Yet, somehow, the shock and disgust eluded him during his many years in the service of a government that to this day, according to major international human-rights organizations, tortures opponents.

Perhaps it was the nakedness, which we are repeatedly told has brought so much consternation to the sensitivities of the Arab people. There are, to be sure, cultural differences between the Arab world and the West. According to Human Rights Watch, for example, homosexual men have been entrapped, arrested and tortured by Egyptian security forces.

Syrian government newspapers, reporting on the mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners also expressed horror, if not shock, because they already expected the worst from Americans. That from a country with a decades-old dictatorship that has killed thousands upon thousands of its own citizens and where just three months ago a local group reported that political prisoners in government custody suffer unspeakable treatment that often leads to serious injury or death.

Torture of prisoners is hardly shocking in many Arab countries, no matter what leaders with a newfound love for human rights now proclaim. In fact, the same governments that today so deeply feel the suffering of Iraqi prisoners found little to complain about in the grotesque abuses of Saddam Hussein's regime. The techniques that left hundreds of thousands of Iraqis in mass graves and kept torture chambers stained with human blood did not cause much consternation among Arab leaders.

We hold Western democracies to humanitarian and democratic principles, as we should. But regimes that use torture as a normal part of their efforts to keep their stranglehold in power, as do many in the Middle East, are highlighting their own violations by speaking out against the outrages at Abu Ghraib.

Frida Ghitis writes about world affairs.

Link
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 May, 2004 03:22 am
Bushite
"But just a decade or two ago, the same groups stood by while hundreds of thousands of Iraqis were dumped into mass graves. They even supplied Saddam with lethal chemicals subsequently used against the local population."

Yes, the USA govt. of Raygun and Bush 1 are guilty of the above.

Bush 1 encouraged the Shi'ites to overthrow Saddam and when they tried to do so Bush 1 did not do a damn thing to help them. Republicans are shameless, sociopathic,warmongering greedy war profiteering scum and a cancer on the nation of America that used to be a Democracy until both the Republicans and Democrats decided to feed full time on the Oligarchy trough.
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 May, 2004 03:26 am
Although no one likes to admit it and although we prefer to believe ourselves civilised, the ill-treatment, abuse and torture of our own suspects and prisoners has been commonplace across America for decades. The fact that, amongst the innocent, many arrested are considered by society to be human scum, should never justify widespread illegal atrocities against them.

Nevertheless, before the invasion, the President promised to replace the Saddam regime with American Democracy.

Surely, in respect of Iraqi detainees, he has already delivered his greatest achievement? Cool
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 May, 2004 07:44 pm
John Webb

I honestly don't believe that you are right that it is common practice to either phyically or sexually abuse prisoners in our country in order to get information or just for the fun of it. I think that if that were true, people would be up in arms and the scandal would run for months. The liberals (of which I am one) would be hollering like crazy. We would probably end up going the other way again where we try and understand criminals instead of being so trigger happy.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Keeping the Promise
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/04/2026 at 04:45:40