10
   

Where does the US(Obama) get OFF Denying Countries UN Ambassadors Access To UN?

 
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 12:31 am
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:
oralloy wrote:
The US played a small role in that revolution. The people mainly responsible for putting the Shah in power were the very same Islamic clerics who later deposed him in 1979.

That is pure BS.

No, even among outsiders, the US role was minimal. The primary outside support came from the UK, who was trying to prevent Iran from stealing their oil.

However, all outsiders played minor roles in putting the Shah in power. The people primarily responsible for installing the Shah into power were the same Iranian clerics who later overthrew him.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 12:32 am
@JTT,
Quote:
The history of America's relationship with Iran illustrates the distance between the claim that we stand for democracy and freedom throughout the world and what the U.S. actually does when that principle is stacked up against another interest: controlling the spigot of the world's oil supply.

The US does not attempt to control the spigot. We just ensure that no one else is able to control it either.

And rightly so.


Quote:
In 1953 the U.S. toppled Iran's popular prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh, putting the Shah of Iran firmly in control.

Hardly. Our role was minor. The Shah was put in power primarily by the same clerics who later overthrew him.


Quote:
The reason the U.S. toppled the Mossadegh regime boils down to one word, the same word that governs most of our policy in the region: oil.

No, that was the UK's motivation. They were trying to prevent the Iranians from stealing their oil.


Quote:
When Mossadegh became prime minister, Iran had one-quarter of the world's proven oil reserves. And yet his country received more income from the sale of its carpets abroad than from its petroleum. The British Empire held a controlling interest in the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), and they were not shy about exerting that control.

And rightly so. It was the UK who expended all the effort in creating the Iranian oil industry. They had every right to those profits after all the work they put into it.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 12:33 am
@JTT,
JTT wrote:
You've been warned many times of oralloy's lying nature, Advocate, but you defended him many times just because he supports your delusion about Israel.

I note your inability to point out any spot where I am wrong about any facts.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 09:49 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

Advocate wrote:
oralloy wrote:
The US played a small role in that revolution. The people mainly responsible for putting the Shah in power were the very same Islamic clerics who later deposed him in 1979.

That is pure BS.

No, even among outsiders, the US role was minimal. The primary outside support came from the UK, who was trying to prevent Iran from stealing their oil.

However, all outsiders played minor roles in putting the Shah in power. The people primarily responsible for installing the Shah into power were the same Iranian clerics who later overthrew him.


Virtually everything written about the coup contradicts your statements.

" In August 2013 the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) admitted that it was involved in both the planning and the execution of the coup, including the bribing of Iranian politicians, security and army high-ranking officials, as well as pro-coup propaganda.[11][12] The CIA is quoted acknowledging the coup was carried out "under CIA direction" and "as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government." [13]"

-- Wikipedia
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 10:14 am
As already noted...this is a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation...and people like Hawk would have been spewing indignation in the other direction if Obama had made the decision the other way.

Total BS.

As for the "honor" of hosting the UN...well, I guess there is some honor involved in that, but there is plenty of crap that comes along with the honor.

If the UN wants to move...I say we should help them pack. The Rockefeller's could have gotten a huge buck for that property...and it could still be used in a way to generate cash for NYC and NY.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 10:41 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
As already noted...this is a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation...and people like Hawk would have been spewing indignation in the other direction if Obama had made the decision the other way.
That does not even make sense, this move was demanded UNANIMOUSLY, It is not an R/D/Obama issue, it is a Washington issue. At base this is a window on how Washington no longer works, this is about how America has no honor. Now if Obama hod done the right thing I would have been cheering.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 10:53 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
As already noted...this is a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation...and people like Hawk would have been spewing indignation in the other direction if Obama had made the decision the other way.
That does not even make sense, this move was demanded UNANIMOUSLY, It is not an R/D/Obama issue, it is a Washington issue. At base this is a window on how Washington no longer works, this is about how America has no honor. Now if Obama hod done the right thing I would have been cheering.



Yeah...you would have been cheering!

Whatever Obama did on this...it would have been the wrong thing for the partisan right...of which you are a part.

But we will never know, because Obama did what he did...and you oppose it.

It is a piece of cake to say what you would have done had things gone the other way.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 10:57 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
As already noted...this is a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation...and people like Hawk would have been spewing indignation in the other direction if Obama had made the decision the other way.
That does not even make sense, this move was demanded UNANIMOUSLY, It is not an R/D/Obama issue, it is a Washington issue. At base this is a window on how Washington no longer works, this is about how America has no honor. Now if Obama hod done the right thing I would have been cheering.


Had Obama gone the other way, this most likely would have been written:

"...this is about how America has no spine."

And probably it would have ended with, "Now if Obama had done the right thing, I would be cheering."

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 12:58 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
Now if Obama hod done the right thing I would have been cheering.


You've had plenty of time to point out one post where you approve of just one thing Obama has done, and can't find one, so that's nonsense.

This is all politics, Iran knows full well American sensibilities about the hostage situation, and there was no chance that Aboutalebi would be given a visa. It was done deliberately to score points internationally, so Iran could paint America as unreasonable in the world's public opinion. It doesn't seem to have worked, you're the only who's fallen for that particular line of bs.

The fact that Aboutalebi has served as ambassador in Italy, Belgium and Australia is irrelevant. The hostage crisis was not about Italy, Belgium or Australia, it was about America. If Iran wants to appoint Aboutalebi as ambassador to the UK, there wouldn't be a visa problem either, but if they tried appointing anyone behind the trashing of the British Embassy in November 2011, they'd be denied access.
Olivier5
 
  0  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 01:15 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
If the UN wants to move...I say we should help them pack.

The UN secretariat should indeed relocate if the US is not going to play ball -- the question is where?
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 01:24 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

Quote:
If the UN wants to move...I say we should help them pack.

The UN secretariat should indeed relocate if the US is not going to play ball -- the question is where?


I understand Paris is nice.

Why not there?
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 03:37 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Berlin is a lot more fun, and symbolically it makes more sense....except that too much of Europe already thinks that Germany is too big for its britches.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 04:19 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Berlin is a lot more fun, and symbolically it makes more sense....except that too much of Europe already thinks that Germany is too big for its britches.


Berlin would work for me also.

Anywhere would work for me if the UN thought its welcome in the US has worn thin.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 04:43 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
You've had plenty of time to point out one post where you approve of just one thing Obama has done, and can't find one


Ya, I pretty much stopped talking about Obama doing things well once he got the job, because in my opinion has has done very little right or well as president. He kept Gates at SEC DEF which I said at the time was a good move. He had Hillary as SEC STATE which I said at the time was a bad move but I was wrong about that. He said he wanted to do High Speed Rail which would be a great idea but we dont have either the money or the political will to do it, so wanting HSR is right but announcing a HSR program (as Obama did) is idiotic when you know (or should know) before you start that you cant get it done. Being concerned about China more than Bush was is a good move but I have seen nothing accomplished on countering China so here again we have Obama with the right idea but with no follow through.

That about sums up the positives.

Other than some nice sounding but useless chin wagging do you have anything to add?

Quote:
Category:Obama Administration initiatives

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Obama_Administration_initiatives

Quote:
America's Great Outdoors Initiative
Our National Parks are massively underfunded, have been for a long time, are falling apart, and Obama has made the problem worse.
Disposition Matrix

Never heard of it.


Feed the Future Initiative

Never heard of it, but our last effort to bump up food production is ruining our farmland, and anyways the solution to not enough food is to have fewer people.

Let's Move!
Small bore and useless
MyRA

Small Bore, useless, and a bad idea.

National Export Initiative

Even if it worked it would not fix what ails the economy, has not worked, and there is very little evidence that much of any effort has gone into making it work

Open Government Initiative

Laughing Laughing Laughing

This joker is a riot!

Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 04:47 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
You've had plenty of time to point out one post where you approve of just one thing Obama has done, and can't find one


Ya, I pretty much stopped talking about Obama doing things well once he got the job, because in my opinion has has done very little right or well as president. He kept Gates at SEC DEF which I said at the time was a good move. He had Hillary as SEC STATE which I said at the time was a bad move but I was wrong about that. He said he wanted to do High Speed Rail which would be a great idea but we dont have either the money or the political will to do it, so wanting HSR is right but announcing a HSR program (as Obama did) is idiotic when you know (or should know) before you start that you cant get it done. Being concerned about China more than Bush was is a good move but I have seen nothing accomplished on countering China so here again we have Obama with the right idea but with no follow through.

That about sums up the positives.

Other than some nice sounding but useless chin wagging do you have anything to add?

Quote:
Category:Obama Administration initiatives

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Obama_Administration_initiatives

Quote:
America's Great Outdoors Initiative
Our National Parks are massively underfunded, have been for a long time, are falling apart, and Obama has made the problem worse.
Disposition Matrix

Never heard of it.


Feed the Future Initiative

Never heard of it, but our last effort to bump up food production is ruining our farmland, and anyways the solution to not enough food is to have fewer people.

Let's Move!
Small bore and useless
MyRA

Small Bore, useless, and a bad idea.

National Export Initiative

Even if it worked it would not fix what ails the economy, has not worked, and there is very little evidence that much of any effort has gone into making it work

Open Government Initiative

Laughing Laughing Laughing

This joker is a riot!




Hawk...Izzy can speak for himself, but I notice that he asked you for any POSTS where you approve of what President Obama has done.

He is not asking for a list of things you can pass off as things you might agree with.

I'll ask Izzy's question as my own right now:

Where in the past have you ever posted anything that shows approval of something Obama has done?

If there is no such post...no shame involved. Just say so.
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 04:56 pm
@hawkeye10,
HSR requires long term planning, the planning has to start somewhere. The HSR link the current UK government is carrying out was put in motion by the previous government, and most of the construction will be done by the next.

If you limit yourself to thinking what can be accomplished in 4 years you'll never get anything important done.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 06:25 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Where in the past have you ever posted anything that shows approval of something Obama has done?


I will give you one:

Quote:
You assume that Obama can't handle Hillary, and this is not clear. I have been Critical of his efforts to handle her in the past, but that fact is his way has worked till now. As a man I have nothing but admiration for Obama's willingness to go head to head with a strong smart woman, with his confidence in Himself. He might be right about his abilities with women, as he did well handling Michelle as well, he put her on a leash and she stayed there.

Post: # 3,483,829
http://able2know.org/topic/125926-1#post-3483829

EDIT: of course later I would conclude that his abondance of confidence in himself is one of his great undoings..... it prevents working with others, and it is generally not warranted based upon the merits of his work.
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 07:17 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
Where in the past have you ever posted anything that shows approval of something Obama has done?


I will give you one:

Quote:
You assume that Obama can't handle Hillary, and this is not clear. I have been Critical of his efforts to handle her in the past, but that fact is his way has worked till now. As a man I have nothing but admiration for Obama's willingness to go head to head with a strong smart woman, with his confidence in Himself. He might be right about his abilities with women, as he did well handling Michelle as well, he put her on a leash and she stayed there.

Post: # 3,483,829
http://able2know.org/topic/125926-1#post-3483829

EDIT: of course later I would conclude that his abondance of confidence in himself is one of his great undoings..... it prevents working with others, and it is generally not warranted based upon the merits of his work.


Thanks.

I am sure you feel this qualifies.

But you ought to realize that what was being asked for was something that he has done officially...in his capacity as president.

You are not going to find one...and I'll leave it at this. The point has been made. The situation of this thread WAS a no win one for Obama with people like you.

I was often that way with Dubya.

I understand.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 07:22 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
The situation of this thread WAS a no win one for Obama
This issue was always going to cost Obama political capital, he could either please the mobs at home or he could please the global elite, but he could not do both.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 07:38 pm
@hawkeye10,
Somebody should ask Obama and those in Congress if it is time to do away with the old practice of generally differing to a presidents choice of cabinet secretaries under the theory that a President should be allowed to have the team he wants. Telling other countries who they can and can not have as their representatives is a very dangerous piece of real estate for America to occupy.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 08:26:25