1
   

The Bush / Clinton connection.

 
 
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 11:45 pm
Under Clinton's watch of 8 years, we cut and ran from Somalia, the World trade center was bombed (didn't fall down the 1st time), 2 embassies are bombed, the USS Cole is attacked and more. I believe President Clinton and his Cabinet did not do enough to stop the gathering storm that hit us on 9-11. Clinton's missiles into the terrorist training camps of Sudan and Afghanistan (Aug 98) was a positive sign that America would not allow the Taliban to attack us (the embassy bombings), but he stopped there. Why did he not complete the job and destroy the Taliban's ability to wag war? This would have stopped the Cole attack and the evil unleashed on 9-11. It seems to me that Bush is continuing Clinton's war. On Bush's missing WMDs, Saddam spent a decade hinting to everyone he had them, spent as much time fighting the United Nations in trying to hide the truth and in the mean time attacked Kuwait and threatened Saudi Arabia. You have to give the Iraq Baath Party credit, they ran an excellent counter-intelligence program against the world. After a decade of escalating attacks against the U.S., I cannot blame any President for drawing the conclusion that America now has multiple enemies coming together to destroy us and moving against the most lethal ones. I am curious how Syria will figure in the missing WMDs.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 657 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
yilmaz101
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 May, 2004 09:56 am
No personal insult meant, but could one be more ignorant.

The taliban were the good guys that the US supported all the way up to when the US started bombing afghanistan in retaliation to 9-11. They were good friends of Chainey, and haliborton, who are gonna build a natural gas pipeline from tajikistan to the indian ocean. It was the al-qaeda that attacked you, not the taliban, the taliban only harbored the al-qaeda in afghanistan.

Saddam had WMD's before he attacked kuwait, as a matter of fact it was the US and UK that provided him with WMD, so that he wouldnt loose to iran in the 80's. After the 1st gulf war the UN inspectors found and destroyed iraqs stockpile of WMDs, what was left of the stuff that the west sold him. This latest eppisode of WMD is about what the west believed he may have produced after 1996. The fact is iraq was being bombed almost monthly with either sam sites or possible WMD production facilities being targeted. Thats why powell made the suggestion that they were possibly making WMDs in the backs of trucks...

WMDs, or more precisely chemical and biological agents are much like nukes, which too are WMD. They are weapons of last resort, the stuff that you hope you don't have to use but do so when you are about to be overwhelmed. Now if saddam had the stuff he would have used it just as the coalition troops were advancing on baghdad, instead of hiding them so well that non has been found yet.

One last point is your notion that if the US had bombed al-qaeda (although you claim the taliban?) more throughly back in 98 they would have been prevented from ramming the cole with a boat full of explosives. You can't destroy terrorists ability to wage attacks by bombing countries, the only way to prevention is through increased security measures. But you get to a point that even with as much security as possible a maniac who is suicidal enough will find a way.......
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 May, 2004 12:27 pm
Welcome aboard and thanks for posting. I'm sure you meant to say Al Qaeda instead of Taliban. There's evidence that President Clinton might have killed Osama when he bombed the terrorist camps if he hadn't informed Pakistan of the bombing prior to doing it. I read somewhere that the prior information was whal allowed Osama to escape death. And of course if he had been killed the USS Cole bombing might not have happened.

There are stories told about WMD being trucked across the Iraqi border into Syria just before the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Supposedly it was cooperation between Ba'ath party officials in the two countries, and the WMD are buried in known locations. Only time will tell if this is truth or rumor.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Bush / Clinton connection.
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/19/2025 at 11:53:31