QUAE MODO PUTRIS ERASET OLENTI SORDIDA COENO PLENAQUE DEFORMI MARTIA TERRA SITU EXUIS HANCTUR PEM XYSTO SUB PRINCIPE FORMAM OMNIA SUNTNIT ID IS CONSPI CENTA LOCIS, DIGNA SALUTIFERO DEBENTUR PREMIA XYSTO O QUANTUM EST SUMMO DEBITA ROMA DUCI VIA FLOREA
BAPTISTA ARCHIONIUS ET LUDIVICEUS MARGANIUS
ANNO SALUTIS MCCCCLXXXIII
The problem or the concern is Logic and what it has to do with Jesus, who is loved by all. Arch Bishop signed it, in signe contest, Pope that's Viar, then that's how they do the year but I'm actually contesting this line myself in other Latin documents older than that, but that's how they do that here. This is a Bishop's document contesting vulgar logic, or the dispute in, surrounding criticism of Christ; a problem of logic that was eloquently written, probably why it's on a tomb, that Lord is in the center of everything, how can it be a conspiracy or a matter of logic? and the dispute is in logic. An eloquent challenge to matters where logic is principally involved.
QUAE MODO: the matter at hand
PUTRIS ERASET: bad will, I think, and OLENTI: talked about, I think, discussed, from Alleged.
ROMA DUCI VIA FLOREA: of Rome through the duke of florence
CONSPI CENTA LOCIS: conspiracy of logic
BAPTISTA ARCHIONIUS: arch bishop
Premia Xysto: Jesus Christ
CURATORES VIAR: written by the Pope