1
   

The 9/11 Cover-up Continues!

 
 
Reply Thu 29 Apr, 2004 03:38 am
Borrowed from today's New York Times:

"The President's Testimony

Published: April 29, 2004

It would have been a pleasure to be able to congratulate President Bush on his openness in agreeing to sit down today with the independent commission on the 9/11 attacks and answer questions. Unfortunately, Mr. Bush conditioned his cooperation on stipulations that range from the questionable to the ridiculous.

The strangest of the president's conditions is that he will testify only in concert with Vice President Dick Cheney. The White House has given no sensible reason for why Mr. Bush is unwilling to appear alone. (When asked at his recent press conference, the president gave one of his patented nonresponses: "Because it's a good chance for both of us to answer questions that the 9/11 commission is looking forward to asking us, and I'm looking forward to answering them.")

Given the White House's concern for portraying Mr. Bush as a strong leader, it's remarkable that this critical appearance is being structured in a way that is certain to provide fodder for late-night comedians, who enjoy depicting him as the docile puppet of his vice president.

Mr. Bush's reluctant and restrictive cooperation with the panel is consistent with the administration's pattern of stonewalling reasonable requests for documents and testimony and then giving up only the minimum necessary ground when the dispute becomes public. Today's testimony will be in private in the White House, away from reporters or television cameras. The session will not be recorded, and there will be no formal transcript. The president's aides have defended this excessive degree of secrecy with the usual arguments about protecting highly classified information and not wanting to establish dangerous precedents.

The idea that the panel may wring from Mr. Bush some comment that may endanger national security is ridiculous. The commission, led by the respected former Republican governor of New Jersey, Thomas Kean, has already heard, in public, from the leaders of the nation's top intelligence agencies, the secretary of defense and Mr. Bush's national security adviser. It seems highly unlikely that the president knows secrets more sensitive than they do. If he did, he would certainly be free to go off the record while discussing them.

The president's aides have also been arguing that making the event anything more than a "meeting" or informal discussion would establish a pattern that future chief executives would be forced to follow. That is true, in a way. If Mr. Bush or any of his successors have the tragic misfortune to be in command at a time when terrorists strike the country, killing thousands of innocent civilians, they should be expected to cooperate with the official investigations, and to do so in a way that puts their statements on the record and into history."

And this is supposed to be the leader of the free world? Rolling Eyes
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 629 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Apr, 2004 05:13 am
I think this will surely hurt them more in the long run than if they just showed and answered questions, if not in public then at least have it recorded. Are they going to be under oath?
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Apr, 2004 05:29 am
NO
Not under oath.

They are warmongering killers and cowards!

911 Commssioners are wimps. They should have demanded seperate interview under oath!

This is OUR Government. Bushco are our representatives not our Kings!!
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Apr, 2004 09:17 am
I just listened to an explanation of why this testimony is being held in the oval office with Bush and Cheney sitting in front of the fire place no less. It is because they view this as just a meeting not a testimony since it is not under oath, they say that transcripts won't be needed. There won't be any still photos either of the scene. I think they said there is one staff memeber of the 9/11 commission. However, all the members were there, I guess that was big of them.

What I am wondering now is if it is just a meeting, can the 9/11 commission members repeat anything to the press anything bush and cheney say to them.

I wonder if any other administration in a free democracy could get away with this with such impunity.
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Apr, 2004 11:10 am
Is there any other alleged democracy in the world where the judges rather than counted ballots decide who wins elections? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The 9/11 Cover-up Continues!
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/14/2024 at 07:22:40