1
   

Morality Test

 
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 07:57 pm
Find me in the fully permissive corner
...

here are my Results

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.07.

Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.

Your Universalising Factor is: 0.00. ??? can i claim a prize somewhere or will i be reported to the (im)morality police ? hbg
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 08:24 pm
Well, now we know where I get the fully permissive thing from!
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 08:26 pm
tho I'm not sure I approve of my father having seen some of those questions. Shocked
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 08:35 pm
The test seems to confuse morality with views on sex.
0 Replies
 
doglover
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:11 pm
Craven de Kere wrote:
The test seems to confuse morality with views on sex.


Sex and morality are joined at the hip, don't ya think?
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:15 pm
Nope
0 Replies
 
tell me why
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:19 pm
Interesting Idea
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:22 pm
I'm thinking about sayings like 'she's got the morals of an alley cat' - that's pretty much always used in the context of someone's attitudes/activities related to sex. I don't think there's a straight-line relationship between sex and morality, but I do think there is a relationship. Someplace between joined at the hip, and not related.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:27 pm
The relationship is that sex is a polemic subject on which individual moral compasses frequently differ.

But one's morality is not defined by sex, how one views sex is defined by one's morality.

Morality covers many issues, sex is just a subset of them.

If this test was not so sex-centric, my score would be different.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:27 pm
Lol - I am .13 for moralizing - I don't wanna see dead chickens stuffed, nor pet cats eaten, either.

Zilch for the other 2.
0 Replies
 
tell me why
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:28 pm
I think that perhaps it is due to the fact that a lot of morals are based around sex, and sexual stuff. Besides, that sex with a chicken question was just disturbing.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:29 pm
Well, I guess it all depends on what your morals are based on.

Mine are not based on how distasteful or revolting I find an act to be.
0 Replies
 
tell me why
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:30 pm
Aha- my reply is oudated! Drats! But I too think my score would be different without all the sex.
0 Replies
 
tell me why
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:32 pm
What definition are we going by Craven?

Main Entry: 1mor·al
Pronunciation: 'mor-&l, 'mär-
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French, from Latin moralis, from mor-, mos custom
1 a : of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior : ETHICAL <moral judgments> b : expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior <a moral poem> c : conforming to a standard of right behavior d : sanctioned by or operative on one's conscience or ethical judgment <a moral obligation> e : capable of right and wrong action <a moral agent>
2 : probable though not proved : VIRTUAL <a moral certainty>
3 : having the effects of such on the mind, confidence, or will <a moral victory> <moral support>
- mor·al·ly /-&-lE/ adverb
synonyms MORAL, ETHICAL, VIRTUOUS, RIGHTEOUS, NOBLE mean conforming to a standard of what is right and good. MORAL implies conformity to established sanctioned codes or accepted notions of right and wrong <the basic moral values of a community>. ETHICAL may suggest the involvement of more difficult or subtle questions of rightness, fairness, or equity <committed to the highest ethical principles>. VIRTUOUS implies the possession or manifestation of moral excellence in character <not a religious person, but virtuous nevertheless>. RIGHTEOUS stresses guiltlessness or blamelessness and often suggests the sanctimonious <wished to be righteous before God and the world>. NOBLE implies moral eminence and freedom from anything petty, mean, or dubious in conduct and character <had the noblest of reasons for seeking office>.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:33 pm
Craven de Kere wrote:
But one's morality is not defined by sex, how one views sex is defined by one's morality.

I'm not fully convinced here, but i'd rather sleep than mull right now.
I don't think my results would be too different if the questions weren't sex-based. I usually end up in the same corner in this sort of quiz.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:33 pm
1a works just fine. The clarifications you seek are not to be found in dictionaries.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:34 pm
ehBeth wrote:
Craven de Kere wrote:
But one's morality is not defined by sex, how one views sex is defined by one's morality.

I'm not fully convinced here, but i'd rather sleep than mull right now.
I don't think my results would be too different if the questions weren't sex-based. I usually end up in the same corner in this sort of quiz.


That your result would be the same would really say nothing about which is the chicken.
0 Replies
 
tell me why
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:37 pm
OoOOo....I seek clarifications..... I think that people can define morals as however they please, just as they define right and wrong. People's rights and wrongs differ. I respect people's free choice, but I know my outlook is somewhat altered by my belief system. ....It's really late, do I make sense? I'm going to bed now....hope to continue this later....sehr interessant....
0 Replies
 
doglover
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 09:42 pm
I think that in today's world, sex and morals are probably not as 'joined at the hip' as they were, say, in the Victorian era.Morals pertaining to sex has loosened considerably since the 1960's. For instance...it's no longer considered shameful for a teenager or woman to become pregnant out of wedlock...today, it's acceptable for an unmarried couple to live together without the benefit of marriage...these days, a woman isn't considered a tramp if she dates/sleeps with more than one man at a time.

I think that most of society finds incest immoral, having sex with animals immoral, as well as bigamy, homosexuality and pedophelia immoral.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2004 10:00 pm
Wabout bigotry
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Morality Test
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/09/2024 at 01:13:30