Morality Test

Carrots eh? I think you've found the root of the problem then. My good fellow, on a scale of one to ten, urinate!

And here I though I was in seven...

I had 0, 0, and -1 and it said I was fully permissive. That's not right. I still think that if it injures someone it's wrong. But none of those scenarios involved someone injuring someone else. They all bothered me, but that doesn't make them morally wrong.

Oh, it's probably just a side effect of being an anthro major.

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.40.
Your Interference Factor is: 0.20.
Your Universalising Factor is: 0.20.

Interesting test.

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.03.

Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.

Your Universalising Factor is: 0.00.

"Fully Permissive"...now I need to read up to see what's being discussed!

KP

Mine's:

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.57.
Your Interference Factor is: 0.20.
Your Universalising Factor is: 1.00.

I don't need to take sides but according to this test I'm consistently sided with "personal morality" folks, and I think the result confirmed my style, too. I'm a moral counselor and I'm pleased to see I'm at least consistent and my position does not sound totally dogmatic - otherwise I'm in trouble because I have to "listen" to and "understand" what people say and do.

panzade, craven and I have the same score.

0.00
0.00
-1


I think I'm in good company!

cavfancier, I didn't take much notice of my scores but I did get the same response as you. I think I confused it by answering inconsistently. Perhaps this might be taken as evidence that this test, while fascinating (and really yuk in a couple of parts), should not be taken as an accurate measure of a persons morality. I mean, can you actually measure morality?