Why do people deny evolution?

Only a fool or a troll would have no clue what 'right' means in science, It means A SUCCESSFUL PARADIGM OPEN TO REVISION Concepts of 'reality' ,'truth' and 'picturing'are philosophical side issues leading to futile debate,

About to lose your head yet again I see

I wonder if he is aware of how hard Eckert and Mauchly worked to eliminate quantum effects in early computers.

QM is now the limiting factor to staying on the path of Moore's Law, like quantum tunneling and all those other things that make the computer the virtual opposite of QM.

Time running faster/slower etc what a joke on the mind it all is. And 'curved' space?? lol, talking about contradictions!. No one and nothing can 'curve' space, nor spacetime.

No one and nothing can 'curve' space, nor spacetime. it's all idiocy.

Yes really. And unlike you I HAVE studied, andd written academic papers on the history and philosophy of science, which allows me to inform you that use of the word ' bollocks' is clearly indicative of an ignoramus and social misfit.

Your atoms are clocks. There frequencies keep time. It is a fact that if you are on earth where the Earth's gravitational field is strong your atoms would vibrate at a slower frequency than they would if you were orbiting in space.

Look at it like this. If space has a three dimensional spacial structure like the frame of a skyscraper that is made up of cubic rooms. If you replace one of the rooms in the center of the sky scraper with a room made up of matter, that room will take up more space and and expand out into the three dimensional cubic frame of space. This causes the frames of space around the the now larger room of matter in the middle to warp around it to accept the larger volume.

What special relativity states though, (and it is correct because of Planck's Law) is that there is always the same amount of energy in the rooms of the skyscraper no matter how much volume the room encloses. (Larger rooms have less energy density than smaller ones or matter has less energy density than empty space.)

But we know matter stores energy so you might ask how can this be true if matter stores more energy than space? It is true because to an observer looking from the outside of the sky scraper in, can't tell how much energy is in the room until you destroy the skyscraper and the room. When we do this, we find out that inside the matter rooms there was a whole bunch of smaller rooms storing very dense energy. We call these atoms. Destroying the rooms releases this extra stored up energy from the embedded much smaller rooms (atoms) as nuclear energy.

The troll claims to have 'studied' ! Laughing
Clearly the subjects of ontology and epistemology were not included in his limited educational experience judging by his infantile use of the words 'is' and 'explanation'.

Essential reading for scientific trolls.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions
...including following all links.

If you are 'aware' of the literature, you have clearly not understood it. Paradigm change does not originate from half baked moaning from educational dropouts, but from hands-on researchers in a field who might offer an insight on a more elegant or more comprehensive alternative to the status quo.
BTW I don't think you qualify for an ad hominem....maybe an ad trollinem.

'science' or physics for that matter, doesn't even understand what TIME is, yet they work with it.
and NO, space can't be curved at all. oh and the so called effects , because of spece curving can be easily explained by optical effects. Really nothing special about the effects.

Please explain your understanding of time and these optical effects. An analogy like I used could be helpful.

Of course I am capable of grading your 'understanding' , having been paid professionally to do so for genuine students.

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it![/u]

You are surely not claiming to be a 'hands on researcher, are you' ?

Your picture represents how when light travels through three different mediums (the glass, the fluid in the glass, and the air). The mediums are made up of particles and those particles are different sizes and have different densities depending on the medium.

This change in density of the mediums is exactly what is happening to the space time continuum as it comes into contact with the medium of matter.

The particles are also vibrating at different frequencies making the speed of light different in each medium. This speed of light is how our mind understands and perceives time. If you wear a clock and could exist in the air, the glass or the fluid in the glass each clock would keep time a little differently because each medium would cause your clock to operate (because your clocks atoms would vibrate a a frequency similar to the particles that make up the medium it is in.

So your picture is proving relativity is correct because, both relativity and your illustration, depend on the frequency of the vibrations of the mediums (the internal clocks) being different.

This speed of light is how our mind understands and perceives time.