Why do people deny evolution?

It's a pretty far reach to claim that something is beyond "what nature could not do on its own" You simply don't know everything nature has done.

I see that you have also studiously ignored George's point that whatever man does is natural because man is a part of nature.

Tell me, Mr. Ignorance of what Science Is, what scientific evidence can you provide for your magic sky daddy superstition, and your "intelligenct design" superstition?

Science USED to say

Since scientific knowledge is still growing by a factor of ten every 50 years, it should not be surprising that lots of facts people learned in school and universities have been overturned and are now out of date. But at what rate do former facts disappear? Arbesman applies the concept of half-life, the time required for half the atoms of a given amount of a radioactive substance to disintegrate, to the dissolution of facts. For example, the half-life of the radioactive isotope strontium-90 is just over 29 years. Applying the concept of half-life to facts, Arbesman cites research that looked into the decay in the truth of clinical knowledge about cirrhosis and hepatitis. “The half-life of truth was 45 years,” reported the researchers.

In other words, half of what physicians thought they knew about liver diseases was wrong or obsolete 45 years later. As interesting and persuasive as this example is, Arbesman’s book would have been strengthened by more instances drawn from the scientific literature.

Science USED to say Life came ONLY from Life.
Have they backtracked?

Lots of stuff which is now believed to be untrue. That's what science is, it's not dogma set in stone.

Tell me, Mr. Ignorance of what Science Is, what scientific evidence can you provide for your magic sky daddy superstition, and your "intelligenct design" superstition?

can provide considerably more than science has for many of its own sky daddies.

But then there are the infinite (Ha!) multiverses necessary to make this one an accident, and the incredible accident than we never observed or reproduced (you know, like in science) that made life from rocks. That last one requires faith without evidence the likes of which can't be found in any church.

Just remember that everything you think nature has done is an assumption

Since scientific knowledge is still growing by a factor of ten every 50 years, it should not be surprising that lots of facts people learned in school and universities have been overturned and are now out of date.

I have a good name for it --- "The Morning Star".

Everything I knoow of that is included within the theory of evolution have been concluded based on repeatable evidence and experiment.

you could not count the times when 'Evolution' has been called "Fact" and "Settled Science" and is no longer in question

people who question this 'science' are called 'science deniers'

Really. I gave you more credit than that.

Leadfoot Quote:
"you could not count the times when 'Evolution' has been called "Fact" and "Settled Science" and is no longer in question"

farmer replied:
Thats often a well used proposition by IDers.

So you think that people who believe the world is less than 100 K years old, or believe that dinosaurs can be dated using C14, or that "irreducible complexity" is a fact are NOT science deniers