Why do people deny evolution?

micro not macro.

a lot is in your imagination btw!

Most macro evolution causing macro difference took place at the early stages of life on earth. But all life is traceable back to a basic form from which relative difference caused divergents. Relative design causes all change in all things.

nope it is not. ONLY in your imagination, mate. Why? because of lack of evidence.

It is all bollocks and rubbish.

Ha.

Ha

Local changing physics and biology is the stuff illusions are made of and relativity is the unmoving changer.

Just one well placed grenade...and...boom - an improvement to the gene pool.

Hope ya isnt contemplating suicide there rags.

Hardly that! Perhaps awaiting a martinizing, though.

Ha.

Been away from the thread for awhile, looks like this was the only thing worth noting while I was away.

It's a repeat of what I've said before but the banana/man DNA link is easily explained by 'software reuse'. Evolution explainations make me want to say WTF!

It is only by taking it with a large dose of methodological naturalism koolaid that allows one to swallow evolution as the answer to the DNA record without throwing up.

It's still a better "explaination" than an invisible guy in the sky.

A lot of the time you give rhetorics, explanations and other rubbish,

However, you never came up with any evidence, mate!

Now, why is that? Why do you blindly believe the evolution nonsense?

you're still dodging aand evading. We gave you 30+ evidences of macro evolution and you STILL haven't been able to refuteevn a single on. You're nothing but a liar and a charlatan, so STFU-

Well, well, well, you feel a bit like a sorry stalker, are you? lol

First of all it were 29 so you are lying here, and furthermore I explained one of those 'evidences' away, but nobody reacted to that. So what is the point mate?

It is all hoaxes and a mix of micro evolution,

Nowhere any macro evolution in site.


Or do you really think you came from a rock? well in your case....




Man o man what a strange fellow this is.

Ugh, dragged in by own curiosity... Do you agree that micro evolution exists?

I'm not sure about Que's position but even if one believes the whole enchilada, micro and macro, it still doesn't settle anything.

Science believes it happened by natural selection and mutation. Several aspects of it seem very unlikely but it is supported by a fossil recording the fact that it did in fact happen. It is a plausible scenario.

A theist can believe it happened as well but that the unlikely aspects of it(Cambrian explosion for example) are beyond what natural selection and mutation can accomplish and are best explained by a guiding intelligence. That too is a plausible scenario. That guiding intelligence existing or not is a separate question.

So why do people deny evolution? I don't know, there is no reason to do so.

Lack of evidence, mate, lack of evidence, mate, lack of.......

yes, but please don't say now that is prove for macro evolution

please please don't do that!

It is sooooooooooooooooo stupid to say that,

It might be a hypothesis yes, but we have to PROVE that,

well, so far no one has done that!

Yes, we have. Stop lieing.