Why do people deny evolution?

Wouldn't it be so cool to be having brain surgery and being allowed to touch your own brain with your fingers?

That said, we're touching our own brains all the time. If there were no physical
connection between the brain and the rest of the body, we'd all be vegetables.

I don't think it's that far a step to touching the brain - though the feedback loop might be a bit crazy.

A friend of mine is a neuropsychologist who does a lot of surgical consults and has attended some surgeries to assist the surgeon in assessing the effect of some cuts. She said it's amazing to talk to someone whose skull has been opened and whose brain is visible.

Now that you have rediscovered your train, you might want to start to look for the tracks that it hasn't been on for quite some time.

Ha. Einstiens tracks and Einstiens train. Consciousness and relativity. Consciousness being four dimensional and creation like a car came out of consciousness. What do reckon.

I read somewhere recently that the human brain is the only thing that has named itself. It gave me pause...

Yeah see what you mean the brain named consciousness consciousness and consciousness named the brain brain. Or was it consciousness that named consciousness consciousness. Ha

Well clearly for some the denial is an abject failure of their 'education' system.

This is terrifying

http://www.salon.com/2015/06/17/5_completely_insane_things_christian_fundamentalists_are_teaching_their_kids/

What if they opened your head and discovered where the magician gets all his rabbits from?
Scary.
Probably should avoid it, where possible.

Denial of what.

Everything's ireversably changing including the evolution in species. But is consciousness a constant that does not change. Brains come and go but on of four dimensional consciouness remains indistinguishably the same.

Consciouness is the king of the all the reference frames because it knows as an observer. The brain of an observer measures the speed of light and finds its self to be inside a stationary consciousness as regard to all ref frames. Radio waves allways hit a statioary radio .

It's been almost a week now, and I still don't know what to do with that.

What about put it in ya pipe and smoke it fbm. Ha

Comic interlude, of course.

Yep Interlude is a good word because the universe is and interlude of God as seen by from a brains perspective. Before anything was created there was a state of nonmovment and then there was light and movement came into existence. But God was the nonmovement in that movement. And so God is then the nonlocality in the locality as relativity in all movement which is the consciouness of a brain. The brain is then a physical interlude in unmoving consciousness. We really are the stuff that dreams are made of.

They deny it because they perceive it as an intrusion to their cultural ecosystem and regard it as a threat. That the theory of evolution is right is of little importance when your main concern is to keep your flock afloat...

if you say that more simply, it wouldnt sound like youre merely puffing.

I honestly don't know any simpler way of saying it. It is what it is.
Perhaps if your gang understood better what I am pointing at these guys would be no news, like they are no news in Europe...unfortunately the fact of the matter is that you gave them spot light in a plate.

Look at the people who provide you with the "science" regarding evolution. ahah. they are a corrupt government first of all. you have not seen the moon landing, or carbon dating take place, or an extinct animal living. Therefor your faith is not SCIENTIFIC.

The way you put faith in the people providing the information that you found your religious faith in evolution on is fundamentally flawed. They are not credible or reliable resources.

In addition. I proved creation as being scientifically accurate. The world expanded form within itself on the third day of Creation. This geological anomaly is 100% factual and provable.

So I do not believe in evolution because of Creations validity, however, when I was an agnostic lying and claiming hat I was atheist, I still denied evolution because it's source is completely unreliable, dishonest, self-serving, and in support of the corrupt politics of government.

furthermore. Carbon dating has no scientific reference point. as if you do not have something that is 1 000 000 years old factually, no mathematical formula or theory can determine that anything else such as a fossil is that old. Logic. common sense. something atheists lack.