Where are the Conservative voices?

Forums: able2know, Politics, a2k, Conservatives, Us Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Below viewing threshold (view)

@jcboy,

jcboy wrote:

The three fools you mentioned I don’t consider conservative, they are nothing but right wing garbage. They hate the president for one reason and that’s because he’s black,.

Oh look, another pedophile.

jcboy wrote:

The three you mentioned shouldn’t be part of any political party, they are simply morons plain and simple.

You pedophiles shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own stupidity.

0 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@mysteryman,

mysteryman wrote:

I have come down on all 3 of them at one time or another, because of what they have posted.

You denounced us for supporting civil rights and then whined piteously because you had been exposed as a Fascist who hates civil rights.

0 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@panzade,

panzade wrote:

izzy , over the years I have seen MM speak out against the diatribes of the far right. To me he's a Conservative with a conscience and I look forward to his posts.

Maybe if you equate "Fascism and opposition to civil rights" with "having a conscience".

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Quote:

You pedophiles shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own stupidity.

This convoluted sentence should be reason enough to convince A2kers not to engage in any discussion with you
Calling jcboy a pedophile absolutely cements your reputation as an insensitive moron

3 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@maxdancona,

Quote:

If you are a Conservative with a sense of decency, where are you to speak up against hate speech from your own side

because what is to you hate speech is to conservatives often conclusions based upon the merits. if liberals what to have a dialog with the other side this is possible but only after they decide they are ready to allow speech to function, and only after they drop the demand that everyone must agree with them before a conversation can take place.

2 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@panzade,

panzade wrote:

This convoluted sentence should be reason enough to convince A2kers not to engage in any discussion with you

Hardly convoluted. If you aren't able to follow a straightforward sentence, don't take it out on me.

And don't whine so much. If you low-IQ types want to run around falsely accusing people of being as stupid as you are, then you should just accept that you are going to get something like that in response.

panzade wrote:

Calling jcboy a pedophile absolutely cements your reputation as an insensitive moron

You, also, should not run around falsely accusing people of your own stupidity.

0 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@hawkeye10,

hawkeye10 wrote:

because what is to you hate speech is to conservatives often conclusions based upon the merits.

Yes indeed. Well said.

----

I should amend my blanket condemnation of liberals though I suppose. There is indeed a prevalent strain of liberals who are extremely stupid and who characterize it as hate speech when someone disagrees with them. This would include every leftist who has posted in this thread so far.

But there are also highly intelligent liberals who don't deserve to be lumped in with these freaks.

1 Reply

Below viewing threshold (view)

@oralloy,

Quote:

There is indeed a prevalent strain of liberals who are extremely stupid and who characterize it as hate speech when someone dares to disagree with liberal ideology .

fixed

Quote:

I should amend my blanket condemnation of liberals though I suppose.

if you want to converse and coexist with them certainly.

Quote:

But there are also highly intelligent liberals who don't deserve to be lumped in with these freaks.

that's the spirit!

1 Reply

Below viewing threshold (view)

@hawkeye10,

Quote:

because what is to you hate speech is to conservatives often conclusions based upon the merits. if liberals what to have a dialog with the other side this is possible but only after they decide they are ready to allow speech to function, and only after they drop the demand that everyone must agree with them before a conversation can take place.

Nailed it. And what is not legitimate with my argument? I say that Islam is a serious problem. And there are a enough reasons due to their(Muslims)actions.

And I say I do not have to like homosexuals. I must obey the law and give them all the rights I have, but again liking them is MY CHOICE. And what I think is better is just as legitimate ,if not more, than gang prattle. And the reliance on lip service instead of any action. Not to forget constant deflection from the real topic.

1 Reply

Below viewing threshold (view)

@hawkeye10,

hawkeye10 wrote:

oralloy wrote:
But there are also highly intelligent liberals who don't deserve to be lumped in with these freaks.

that's the spirit!

No sarcasm, really there are.

However, most of the smart liberals on A2K have stopped posting about politics. (I can think of one who still does though.)

I really don't want to name names, because invariably I'll accidentally leave someone's name off the list, but not every liberal is a raving imbecile like the liberals who have posted in this thread.

0 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@coldjoint,

and as a former liberal and self avowed leftist let me say that if the right wants to talk to liberals they need to stop demanding that everyone agrees that markets always work for humans, and they need to give the left credit for understanding the power of intention, that we can create better by setting out to make better.

conservation and creation must always work in balance, they are both needed, the other side is not "wrong" it is the other side of the coin..the needed opposite.

0 Replies

@panzade,

panzade wrote:

Quote:
You pedophiles shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own stupidity.

This convoluted sentence should be reason enough to convince A2kers not to engage in any discussion with you
Calling jcboy a pedophile absolutely cements your reputation as an insensitive moron

This orally idiot it too ignorant to realize pedophilia is a crime and accusing someone of a crime is actionable but its probably not worth the time or money to go after his ass, I mean what am I going to do with a hut on a 6000 sq ft lot with no running water and only a generator for electricity in Kentucky?

3 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@jcboy,

jcboy wrote:

This orally idiot it too ignorant

You trash shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own idiocy and ignorance.

0 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@jcboy,

Quote:

This orally idiot it too ignorant to realize pedophilia is a crime and accusing someone of a crime is actionable but its probably not worth the time or money to go after his ass, I mean what am I going to do with a hut on a 6000 sq ft lot with no running water and only a generator for electricity in Kentucky?

One thing for sure this guy doesn't know is the law. That is because liberals think it is something you can change as you go. Call him anything you wish. The is not one thing he can do.

1 Reply

Below viewing threshold (view)

@coldjoint,

coldjoint wrote:

One thing for sure this guy doesn't know is the law.

I'm reasonably confident that jcboy doesn't know much about anything at all. Laughing

0 Replies

@panzade,

Defamation Law: The Basics

Quote:

Defamation Law: The Basics

There is always a delicate balance between one person's right to freedom of speech and another's right to protect their good name. It is often difficult to know which personal remarks are proper and which run afoul of defamation law.

The term "defamation" is an all-encompassing term that covers any statement that hurts someone's reputation. If the statement is made in writing and published, the defamation is called "libel." If the hurtful statement is spoken, the statement is "slander." The government can't imprison someone for making a defamatory statement since it is not a crime. Instead, defamation is considered to be a civil wrong, or a tort. A person that has suffered a defamatory statement may sue the person that made the statement under defamation law.

Defamation law, for as long as it has been in existence in the United States, has had to walk a fine line between the right to freedom of speech and the right of a person to avoid defamation. On one hand, people should be free to talk about their experiences in a truthful manner without fear of a lawsuit if they say something mean, but true, about someone else. On the other hand, people have a right to not have false statements made that will damage their reputation. Discourse is essential to a free society, and the more open and honest the discourse, the better for society.

Elements of a Defamation Lawsuit

Defamation law changes as you cross state borders, but there are normally some accepted standards that make laws similar no matter where you are. If you think that you have been the victim of some defamatory statement, whether slander or libel, then you will need to file a lawsuit in order to recover. Generally speaking, in order to win your lawsuit, you must show that:

Someone made a statement;
that statement was published;

2 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@jcboy,

So you as a screenname are going to sue who? What a ******* idiot.

0 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@jcboy,

jcboy wrote:

Defamation Law: The Basics

Nice try, but I'm not intimidated. Laughing

Funny though.

0 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

Hey that thing with the name-calling tags looks fun. Can I play too?

http://able2know.org/forum/jcboy_pedophile/

2 Replies

Below viewing threshold (view)

@oralloy,

oralloy wrote:

Hey that thing with the name-calling tags looks fun. Can I play too?

http://able2know.org/forum/jcboy_pedophile/

what? I thought I was the resident token pedophile! have I been replaced?

0 Replies

Where are the Conservative voices?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know