Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 03:09 pm
Quote:
The Munich Agreement was a settlement permitting Nazi Germany's annexation of portions of Czechoslovakia along the country's borders mainly inhabited by German speakers, for which a new territorial designation "Sudetenland" was coined.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement
What happened very shortly afterwards? Our new deal with Iran right now is the modern equivalent to this. France and England did all they could do to stop the war.

As we know Hitler had other ideas and so does Iran. They lie. They have been caught lying. They are Islamists and obligated to an eternal war. I guess we could see if there is anything else they wish, it can't hurt anymore than bomb they will use as soon as they can.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 2,875 • Replies: 87

 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 03:37 pm
What is going deleting posts? Is this a free speech forum or not?
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 03:39 pm
Please do not tell me you(this forum) do not have the guts to talk about Islam.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 05:35 pm
Well, those nations in the middle east that think that Iran having nuclear weapons would be an existential threat might just circle the wagons (aka, mutual defense treaties)? So, this might not be a prelude to what occurred prior to WWII, but a prelude to what occurred prior to WWI?
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 06:50 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
What is going deleting posts? Is this a free speech forum or not?

If your post was an exact duplicate of a previous post, the hamsters might have devoured it.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 06:51 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
Quote:
The Munich Agreement was a settlement permitting Nazi Germany's annexation of portions of Czechoslovakia along the country's borders mainly inhabited by German speakers, for which a new territorial designation "Sudetenland" was coined.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement
What happened very shortly afterwards? Our new deal with Iran right now is the modern equivalent to this. France and England did all they could do to stop the war.

As we know Hitler had other ideas and so does Iran. They lie. They have been caught lying. They are Islamists and obligated to an eternal war. I guess we could see if there is anything else they wish, it can't hurt anymore than bomb they will use as soon as they can.

If this deal with Iran falls through, they will face NATO bombardment of their illegal nuclear program.

And if for some reason NATO refused to bomb (very little chance of such a refusal), Israel would do it themselves.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 06:52 pm
@Foofie,
Foofie wrote:
Well, those nations in the middle east that think that Iran having nuclear weapons would be an existential threat might just circle the wagons (aka, mutual defense treaties)? So, this might not be a prelude to what occurred prior to WWII, but a prelude to what occurred prior to WWI?

It is unlikely that Iran will be allowed to make a nuclear bomb. It is virtually certain that NATO will bomb them first. And if NATO somehow refuses, it is virtually certain that Israel will do it.

But if Iran did somehow manage to avoid being bombed and acquired nuclear weapons, the next step would be to see if the world (including Russia and China) wished to preserve the NPT. If they do, Iran will be crushed by overwhelming sanctions until they give up their nukes.

If the NPT is abandoned, then the US will be free to transfer nuclear weapons technology to our allies. Various countries neighboring Russia and China would likely be very interested in possessing American-designed thermonuclear warheads. Poland and Georgia, for instance. Also South Korea, Japan, the Philippines, and Australia.

I suspect that when they consider the consequences of the NPT failing, Russia and China will decide to sacrifice Iran.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 08:28 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
If this deal with Iran falls through, they will face NATO bombardment of their illegal nuclear program.

And if for some reason NATO refused to bomb (very little chance of such a refusal), Israel would do it themselves.


If falling through means a nuclear bomb going off in Israel, or for that matter anywhere, means the end. If you have been paying attention Iranian leaders are twelvers.

The coming of the 12th Iman comes after the world or at least most of it is destroyed. And Islam has proven themselves liars all though history. And do not think this is not a sacred duty to them.

What is sad is that it is avoidable.
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 08:38 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
They are Islamists and obligated to an eternal war.


Your math, among other things, is really screwy, coldplay. It isn't the Iranians who "[O]ver 200 times we [the USA] have put our forces into other countries to force them to our will. We've been in the business of being a country for about 200 years. We've spent fifty years at war," ... .

- John Stockwell
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 08:39 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
They lie. They have been caught lying


By 'they', you, of course, mean the US.

Nobody does lying better than the evil US of A.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 08:56 pm
@JTT,
You are an idiot if you do not consider unbalanced Islamists are a threat.

And this thread is not about bashing the USA. Start your own thread.
maxdancona
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 09:05 pm
@coldjoint,
Hmmmm ColdJoint

This thread IS about bashing the USA. The title of the thread is "Appeasment" and it is clearly intended to criticize the actions of the US toward Iran.

Any way the USA has a Muslim population, a Constitution that protects the rights of this Muslim population and a large number of non-Muslim citizens who oppose hate-filled bigots attacking the Muslim population.

Cold Joint, you seem to do your share USA bashing.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 09:16 pm
@maxdancona,
Quote:
hate-filled bigots attacking the Muslim


What are these, if not hate filled bigots?
Quote:
Islam's Latest Contributions to Peace "Mohammed is God's apostle. Those who follow him are harsh
to the unbelievers but merciful to one another" Quran 48:29

2013.11.26 (Somariyeh, Syria) - A Shahid suicide bomber detonates a bus stop, taking fifteen souls with him.
2013.11.25 (Karachi, Pakistan) - A man and his wife are murdered merely for being Shia.
2013.11.25 (Baghdad, Iraq) - A vicious double-bombing at a cafe snuffs out the lives of twenty-three patrons and first responders.
2013.11.24 (Kuka, Nigeria) - Five residents of a Christian village are shot dead by Muslim terrorists.
2013.11.24 (Mosul, Iraq) - A Christian journalist is gunned down in a targeted attack.
2013.11.23 (Karachi, Pakistan) - Sectarian rivals shoot at three seminary students, killing one.

* Sources for individual incidents can be provided upon request.
LINE


Wake up, bigots hate for no reason. The enmity so richly deserved by Islam has countless valid reasons. I know all you got is bigot. But this problem is not as simple as you.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 09:30 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
If falling through means a nuclear bomb going off in Israel, or for that matter anywhere, means the end.

"Falling through" only means they are not abiding by the deal.

NATO will bomb and destroy their nuclear facilities before they manage to develop nuclear weapons. And if for some inexplicable reason NATO doesn't, Israel will.
0 Replies
 
LvB
 
  4  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 09:30 pm
2 tablespoons butter

1/2 cup orzo pasta

1/2 cup diced onion

2 cloves garlic, minced

1/2 cup uncooked white rice

2 cups chicken broth


Melt the butter in a lidded skillet over medium-low heat. Cook and stir orzo pasta until golden brown. Stir in onion and cook until onion becomes translucent, then add garlic and cook for 1 minute. Mix in the rice and chicken broth. Increase heat to high and bring to a boil. Reduce heat to medium-low, cover, and simmer until the rice is tender, and the liquid has been absorbed, 20 to 25 minutes. Remove from heat and let stand for 5 minutes, then fluff with a fork.
maxdancona
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 09:30 pm
@coldjoint,
Of course those are hate-filled bigots. That is the point ColdJoint.

You have a lot in common with them. You scoff at people who you see as moderates for looking for common understanding, just as they do. You believe that God should be considered in social policy, just as they do. You have an obsession with stamping out ethnic groups that you see as enemies.

There is a lot in common between you and the Islamic terrorists. I think that is why you are so obsessive about this issue.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 09:36 pm
@maxdancona,
Quote:
Of course those are hate-filled bigots. That is the point ColdJoint.


Tell that to families of the dead Christians or the girls gang raped in the third world and all through Europe.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 10:50 pm
@LvB,
It appears that this LvB character is behind some of the hostile tags added to the page:
http://able2know.org/user/lvb/
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 10:55 pm
@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:

Of course those are hate-filled bigots. That is the point ColdJoint.

You have a lot in common with them. You scoff at people who you see as moderates for looking for common understanding, just as they do. You believe that God should be considered in social policy, just as they do. You have an obsession with stamping out ethnic groups that you see as enemies.

There is a lot in common between you and the Islamic terrorists. I think that is why you are so obsessive about this issue.



Really?

Please share with us how you know coldjoint is someone who kills people to advance his political agenda.

You could have made a comparison between coldjoint and Islamic fundamentalist but you chose to compare him to terrorists.

Sloppy rhetoric?

I would not be surprised if this was the case, but the alternative interpretation is that you intended to compare him to terrorists because you thought the comparison to be apt. If this is so, you really should provide a whole lot more substantiation, or find yourself, justly, accused of vile calumny.

Throwing off these ridiculous charges shouldn't advance your arguments, but, incredibly, with the max-like minded they do.

BTW - Where did you come up with the notion that coldjoint wants to "stamp out" ethnic groups?
maxdancona
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Nov, 2013 10:55 pm
@oralloy,
Cool!
 

Related Topics

Always Trust a Terrorist? - Question by coldjoint
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Appeasment?
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/23/2019 at 06:53:26